Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

C.S.I. 9/11 Anchorage, Alaska

2007-01-08 19:00
2007-01-08 20:00
Etc/GMT-9

A weekly presentation in Anchorage, Alaska.
C.S.I. 9/11
No conspiracy theory.
No politics.
No debating hypotheticals.
We discuss only the facts that are beyond any doubt.
The weights and measures and the math and physics
of the three towers destruction and the anomalies of the Pentagon damage.
We prove explosive horizontal pressure waves.
We review the book "Without Precedent" by Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean
EVERY TUESDAY 7 - 8 PM
A.T.O.M. Meeting Center
4025 Raspberry at Jewel Lake
Anchorage, Alaska
(907) 562-6306
No Admission Charge

My daydream.

The really ironic thing about your concept is that it would be a guaranteed hit if someone had the testicular fortitude to bring this idea to prime time television. The curiosity factor alone would attract everyone to watch the drama unfold, regardless of their preconceived bias.
Imagine the excitement created every week as people anticipate which way the argument will turn or what new evidence will be produced, when they tune in the following week.
Imagine the office water cooler debates that would ensue as a result.
Imagine the spin masters in high (read low) places scrambling to react to new revelations.
Imagine politicians and journalists having to choose between ducking for cover or stepping up to claim their previously harbored suspicions.
Hey. I can dream can't I?

Mr. Princiotta - Please don't limit yourselves

to only the controlled demolitions at the WTC and the Pentagon questions. You can also look into the probability of the put-options and the anomalies regarding FAA protocols and NORAD response (or lack of same), as well as the military exercises (especially the one going on at the NRO that morning). Finally, taking a critical look at the orgins and activities of the alleged hijackers and Able Danger is also worthwhile line of factual inquiry.

I highly recommend the Elsevier book The Hidden History of 9-11-2001, edited by Paul Zarembka, as an invaluable resource for your presentations.

Best of luck and please let us know how it goes.

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

It takes an internet

Yah, science is fine, but people don't shift worldview over the melting point of steel. They'd rather live in illusions. I'm sorry to break the news.

If we don't provide a viable political/psychological 'frame' in which the scientific facts could have happened, then proof does 9-11 Truth no good. The main resistance to 9-11 Truth is psychological, not scientific.

So I commend this effort, but sideways insults at other analyses are self-defeating. It's tiresome hearing 9-11 bloggers parrot MSM airhead agitprop terms expecting admiration for it. Just do your thing and contribute your part.