Dear Editor,

People believe what you call "9/11 conspiracy theories" in part because the 9/11 Commission was such an obvious farce.

Bush and Cheney waited 441 days before allowing a commission, and voiced public opposition to the idea of an independent investigation of the worst terrorist attack in US history. That fact in itself is one of the most incredible and despicable facts of the post-9/11 period.

When he finally relented Bush appointed Henry Kissinger to be the executive director of the commission, a move of supreme cynicism.

Kissinger stepped down after being quesitoned by the 9/11 families, and was replaced by White House insider Philip Zelikow. Zelikow had co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice, authored the 2002 national security doctrine endorsing pre-emptive war, and was a member of the National Security Council and a former director of the Aspen Strategy Group, whose emeritus members include Rice, Cheney, Scooter Libby, and disgraced NY Times reporter Judith Miller. The rest of the commission sported a variety of conflicts of interest, but it was Zelikow who controlled the activities of the commission and the final edit of the report.

Bush and Cheney refused to testify under oath, or even in separate rooms. They appeared before the commission together, not under oath, and forbid any recording equipment in the room.

The commission did not answer 70% of the questions they were asked by the Family Steering Committee, without whose tenacity the 9/11 Commission would not exist.

NORAD generals and FAA officials perjured themselves in their testimony. This is not disputed by the commission chair and vice chair, Kean and Hamilton, who considered taking the matter to the DOJ.

Evidence was destroyed. Only a small fraction of the steel from the WTC site was preserved for study, which means evidence from a crime scene was destroyed en masse. An FAA manager destroyed tapes of interviews with FAA controllers on 9/11. And there were other examples.

Much of chapters 5 and 7 of the report was based on the alleged testimony of Al Qaeda detainees, who were tortured. On page 146 of the report, the commissioners declared they had not met the detainees, were not allowed to question the detainees, and were not allowed to submit questions to the interrogators. These Detainee Interrogation Reports emerged from a black hole within the national security state. Now we are told that video of one of the central interrogations was destroyed by the CIA.

On page 172 of the report, the commission declares that it does not know where the financing for the attacks originated, and declares the matter "of little practical significance."

I could go on. But I think even these few examples show how secretive, cynical, and fundamentally dishonest were the actions of the government following 9/11. The Bush government lied about Iraq, about the widespread use of torture, about illegal domestic spying, and about dozens of other scandals that have seemingly been forgotten by Mr. Bradley. Why is 9/11 considered considered the one thing about which the Bush regime would not lie, even in light of its refusal to cooperate with the commission it belatedly appointed and stocked with insider hacks?

Sincerely,

Theories are important in scientific research.

The Theory of Relativity, Special Relativity, the Big Bang Theory, Quantum theory.

Much of modern science and engineering came from developing theories, proving them right or wrong and further refining them.

Fact is, the hard science is proving 911 Conspiracy "Theorists" Correct.

I am sure Professor Steven Jones would agree.

We may not be PERFECT about ALL our theory, but neither is Quantum Theory Perfect.

We live and learn.

Only one thing I am sure of, Al-Qaeda alone did not carry out those attacks.

They had a lot of help. And Al-Qaeda Alone did not Cover-Up the Evidence like the WTC steel that should have been investigated for forensic evidence of further foul-play like explosives.

The lack of investigation behind WTC7 is further proof. Justice dealyed...... is justice denied.

How could Al-Qaeda have controlled the coverup? Even if indeed they did actually carry out the attack.

Even a small murder case will have far more detailed investigation than the official investigation of 911.

We should not be afraid of being called a Conspiracy Theorist.

Just remember theories are important in science.

And those with scientific background from AE911Truth.org would probably agree.

People who be-little theories are either ignorant or afraid of facing the truth.

There is also political science. I have another theory. It is called the 911 Propoganda Theory.

It is also known as the Official 911 Commision Report.

We have the hard science. And I am happy to be a 911 Conspiracy Realist and Theorist.

Theories allow us to develop a hypothesis and work towards the goal of proving it wrong or right by varying degrees.

The folks have at AE911truth.org have done a good job on getting the facts clear.

It is the story of human nature. There are always those who choose to be blinded by a flase sense of loyalty and believe power to be Truth.

The fact is Truth is Power. And WE HAVE THE TRUTH.

Happy Holidays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it