All copies of this tape were destroyed . . . . doubtful . . . remember, the perps use disinfo to muddy the waters.

What if they video taped interrogations as a rule but didn't tape this one. That would also be damning considering the suspects purported role in 9/11.

Or . . . what it the tape shows a mentally disturbed suspect rambling on about his most recent bowel movement . . . that would be damning also.

There are many fuses lit right now that all lead back to what we affectionately call the "new world order" . . here's one of them to bookmark and follow:

http://www.madcowprod.com

Please see my comment to a similar post of yours a few days ago.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/13050#comment-172048

There may indeed still be tapes or transcripts, but the story is what it is now and, as mentioned, if those transcripts or tapes ever do reappear, they will only further erode the government story on 9/11. Zubaydah was crazy and subjected to months of torture. What kind of evidence is that?

The focus right now should be on how utterly horrible Zubaydah's "evidence" is. It is ghoulish and macabre and falls so far below the supposed standards of this nation it simply must shock the conscience of anyone who pays attention to it.

See also this story: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/911_commissioner_No_doubt_we_asked_1224.ht...

In it, Kean, clearly states "...they were the ones who knew most about the plot of 9/11."
________________

JFK on secrecy and the press

There is no Al Kida Boogey Man so any confession is BS . . . .that's the bottomline . . . . we know what they're covering up . . . . they are pushing the button to release the covering cloud of smoke but it isn't working.

should be dismissed out of hand?

When in doubt I always apply the logic of events to determine the credibility or usefulness of particular information.

In this case, the fact that shortly after Zubaydah was fooled into thinking he was being interrogated by Saudi's (most likely before he was tortured) three Saudi princes and a Pakistani air force general, all purportedly named by Zubaydah, all died under extremely suspicious circumstances. If this information were not true, would these men have lost their lives?

I think that the tight focus on torture here is an effort to divert attention away from the substance of his statements. I also think that Zubaydah was tortured to the point of insanity so that he would never again be able to make these statements, which destroy the official story, and be viewed as credible.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, are you saying that we should disregard everything that Zubaydah is claimed to have said?

I hope that you and yours are well and that you are all enjoying the holiday season.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

There are many levels to this story, and we may never get to the bottom of it.

What we do know now, though, is what Americans did with Zubaydah and later with the videos of his "testimony."

This story is "hot." It is playing in the news right now. It is based on verifiable facts and shows very clearly that yet another major part of the government story for 9/11 rests on an extremely weak foundation, if you call that a foundation.

People interested in 9/11 Truth can and should use this story in their writing and conversation because it is fact-based and devastating to the official story of 9/11.

Mainstream news is playing this as a story about "waterboarding," "the CIA," "what the White House knew," etc. But WE should be focusing on this story mainly because of the very strong light it shines on the weakness of the official story of 9/11.
________________

JFK on secrecy and the press

I agree, Alvin R. This is the hottest of stories.

It shines the spotlight back to 9/11 (thousands of victims, lies, coverup, etc.) and to what our country's leadership has done in the 21st century.

Approximately 800,000 innocent Iraqis dead in an illegal invasion, use of torture, and thousands of our own dead and wounded soldiers...all based upon Bush's contrived lies of WMD's!

Definitely war crimes in this, but do not expect any convictions coming down the pike soon. However, after every new evidence of the corruption surfaces, we must keep the spotlight's heat back on 9/11, which will eventually cause this can of worms to spill into America's consciousness.

Right is right, wrong is wrong, and those who approve of torture are capable of anything, including 9/11.

and the Pakistani AF Chief may not be related to Zubaydah. He may not have said a single word about these contacts. He may have known nothing of value. Instead this may have been a cover story generated to suggest Zubaydah was an al Qaeda bigshot.

1) I don't trust Posner.

2) I don't trust Posner's anonymous souces (executive branch and CIA official).

3) Why would Zubaydah have direct access to such contacts? It comes across as highly implausible.

4) Other sources (FBI's Dan Coleman) indicate that Zubaydah's importance was overstated and may have been mentally unstable.