Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

CIA Says It Cooperated With 9 / 11 Panel AP 12/22/07

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

http://www.nytimes. com/aponline/ us/AP-CIA- Videotapes. html_
(http://www.nytimes. com/aponline/ us/AP-CIA- Videotapes. html)

CIA Says It Cooperated With 9 / 11 Panel

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: December 22, 2007

Filed at 12:55 p.m. ET 37 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The CIA on Saturday rebutted suggestions the spy agency
was uncooperative and hid from the Sept. 11 commission the videotaped
interrogations of two suspected terrorists, saying it waited until the panel went out
of business before destroying the material now in question.
The destruction in late 2005 of the videotapes of two al-Qaida suspects has
upset a federal judge and riled the Democratic-controll ed Congress, which has
promised an investigation. The Justice Department also is trying to find out
what happened and whether any laws were broken.
A recent memo by _Philip Zelikow_
(http://topics. nytimes.com/ top/reference/ timestopics/ people/z/ philip_d_ zelikow/index. html?inline= nyt-per) , the former
executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, suggests the CIA was less than
forthcoming when asked for documents and other information from the panel,
which investigated the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The CIA disputed that characterization and suggested the panel should have
requested interrogation videotapes specifically if it wanted them.
''The notion that the CIA wasn't cooperative or forthcoming with the 9/11
commission is just plain wrong. It is utterly without foundation,' ' spokesman
Mark Mansfield said Saturday. ''The CIA's cooperation and assistance is what
enabled the 9/11 commission to reconstruct the plot in their very
comprehensive report.''
In a statement e-mailed separately Saturday, Mansfield suggested the
commission should have been specific about wanting videotapes.
''Because it was thought the commission could ask about tapes at some point,
they were not destroyed while the commission was active,'' he said.
Mansfield, citing similar comments this month by CIA Director _Michael Hayden_
(http://topics. nytimes.com/ top/reference/ timestopics/ people/h/ michael_v_ hayden/index. h
tml?inline=nyt- per) , added that ''the tapes were destroyed only when it was
determined they were no longer of intelligence value and not relevant to any
internal, legislative, or judicial inquiries.''
Zelikow's seven-page memo, dated Dec. 13, reviews the commission's requests
for information from the CIA.
It cites a Jan. 26, 2004, meeting of commission members and administration
officials, including then-CIA Director _George Tenet_
(http://topics. nytimes.com/ top/reference/ timestopics/ people/t/ george_j_ tenet/index. html?inline= nyt-per)
, at which the government offered to present written questions to the
detainees and relay their answers back to the commission.
''None of the government officials in any of these 2004 meetings alluded to
the existence of recordings of interrogations or any further information in
the government's possession that was relevant to the commission's requests,''
Zelikow wrote.
Near the end of the commission's work, and in response to a request by the
commission to all agencies, John McLaughlin, then the deputy CIA director,
confirmed on June 29, 2004, that the CIA had ''taken and completed all
reasonable steps necessary to find the documents in its possession, custody or control
responsive'' to the commission's formal requests and ''has produced or made
available for review'' all such documents, the memo said.
The existence of Zelikow's memo was first reported by The New York Times.