If you have problem with the web player plugin (and trust me, you're not the only one) just download the whole video and play it with your player.
Any DivX or XviD codec will do the job.

>Is there a way to get this on YouTube?

I believe the main problem is that the bad compression can't keep the text readable enough.

>Discrediting By Association

Speaking of "third attorney", thanks for clarification. As you said it's pretty clear his (their) attempt to discredit the first two public speeches by association with the bad science promoted by the Fetzer/Wood group. We cannot update the video at this point, but our intention was to leave the video completely neutral, without any comments, and so it is. Thanks.

I appreciate your providing this BUT, any media that begins downloading before user initiation is totally obnoxious. Checking cache, this divx file, which is still downloading without my initiation, has passed 25, no 50, no 75, no 100, no 125, no 150, no 175, no 200, no 250, no 275, to 284 megabytes already. Is this really necessary? No. Of course not.

I see in the embedding code:

param name="autoplay" value="false"

I wish that someone please make this parameter work, maybe something like this?

param name="autodownload" value="NO-gofuckyerselfsillyinatempfolderuntiltoldtodootherwise"

Would you not agree that a smaller file, one that doesn't take until Doomsday to download and that would work just fine in an itsy bitysy teeny weeny little window, would be more appropriate for this site simply to whet people's appetites? A link to a larger, higher quality file, such as you have provided can easily be used with a download manager (an indispensable tool in this day and age) and a standalone player with decidely more functionality later. I can remember a time when people used to expend just a little bit more effort to give advanced warning to viewers/visitors as to file sizes for large files. What happened to that polite little gesture? Why has it been thrown out the window(s)? Did i just answer my own question?

I can imagine that many people who lack broadband see this as inconsiderate. It's just one of those little things that probably keeps many people from viewing important videos such as this. Is there any legitimate reason why the embedded divx player would need 35-65% usage of my CPU? No. More likely, it's just more shitty plugin software probably designed to fit the planned obsolesence model of Big SoftHard, Inc. to keep us in the never ending perpetual upgrade loop.

There are still millions and millions of people in this country who live in rural areas without broadband. I am fortunate to not one of them. But, if I were, I would have been out of here a long time ago.

I encourage you to remove the embedded video from this post until you find a suitable remedy. Otherwise, another wasteful download of 284 megabytes of data will begin again on load or reload of any page on which it is included (three pages so far here at blogger).

I already use flashblocker scripts to deal with Macromedia flash nonsense. Do I need to start searching for scripts capable of blocking divx now?

--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Dir. of Buiding and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)
"We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." (NIST)
--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Dir. of Buiding and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)
"We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." (NIST)

You're not totally wrong at this, but Stage6 (even if annoying) was the only viable option. We CAN'T provide a host for this high quality DivX (necessary for good readability). The encoding provided by YouTube/GoogleVideo is simply too bad for that kind of things. Do you have a solution?