Seven Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11
Alan Miller writes:
My article, Seven Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False", was published yesterday on OpEdNews:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071202_seven_senior_republi.htm
The article details severe criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report by seven senior Republican appointees and their calls for a new investigation. They include:
Paul Craig Roberts, PhD, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan
Catherine Austin Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing under President George H.W. Bush
Morgan Reynolds, PhD, former Chief Economist of the U.S. Department of Labor under current President George W. Bush
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan
Mary Schiavo, JD, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Transportation under Presidents George H.W. Bush and William Clinton
Edward Peck, Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the U.S. State Department. Former U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq
Morton Goulder, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Warning under Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.
This is a continuation of my series of articles about prominent skeptics of the official account of 9/11. The prior article was Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report, published on Sept. 23, 2007. A list of all the articles in this series appears below.
Please help disseminate this critically important information.
Best regards, Alan
- Kevin Barrett's blog
- Login to post comments
MP3 Audio Clips - Paul Craig Roberts
Wednesday July 18, 2007
Reagan Treasury Official Paul Craig Roberts Talks to Thom Hartmann About Bush Possibly Seizing Power
http://www.alexjonesfan58.com/mp3/20070718_tomhartman_paulcraigroberts.mp3
* source = http://www.airamerica.com/thomhartmannpage/
-----------------------------------
Friday July 20, 2007
Reagan Treasury Official Paul Craig Roberts Talks to Alex Jones About Bush Possibly Seizing Power
http://www.alexjonesfan58.com/mp3/20070720_paulcraigroberts_alexjones.mp3
* source = http://www.infowars.com
-----------------------------------
More MP3 Audio Clips >
not all are what . . .
On the day before the 5th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Morgan Reynolds explained to a FOX News audience of millions:
"there are no big Boeing crashes . . . at all four events . . . what you will see is a fake, cartoon display . . ."
Dr. Reynolds exposes 9/11 TV fakery on FoxNews; 9.10.06
www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8 (video)
Yet, surprisingly, PatriotsQuestion911.com displays these people to the public as though they are serious professionals. Morgan Reynolds, for example, is presented with a glowing vitae of career accomplishments suggesting rock solid credibility, even though one click on a link provided brings a reader to questions about what "objects" hit the WTC Towers, and essays ridiculing Prof. Steven Jones, even calling him "retarded."
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/patriots_question/index.html
Certainly some kinds of airplanes hit the towers...
... what precise model they were remains uncertain, I think. Perhaps they were the passenger jets under some kind of remote control. Based on what I've seen, I agree that it is quite possible that some of the videos are manipulated, for whatever reason -- to muddle waters and feed no plane theories perhaps?
And now for a 911 Truth public service anouncment:
Message HERE.
That should sort out any further confusion between standards and censorship.
;-)
______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
Remove Reynolds and Fetzer from Patriots
Who runs the Patriots site? They should certainly remove Reynolds from their site. He undermines our credibility when the whole point of this site is to bolster our credibility.
Paul Craig Roberts, on the other hand, is a definite plus for our movement. I consider him to be the Republican counterpart to someone like Bob Bowman. Ronald Ray appears good also.
Fix Patriots.
Yes, when Reynolds opens his mouth
new problems for us come out.
I agree...
Especially as the subtitle of the site is Responsible criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report.
=======
“Because we live in a largely free society, we tend to forget how limited is the span of time and the part of the globe for which there has ever been anything like political freedom: the typical state of mankind is tyranny, servitude, and misery.” - Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom
Patriots question 9/11
Victronix: "Yet, surprisingly, PatriotsQuestion911.com displays these people to the public as though they are serious professionals. Morgan Reynolds, for example, is presented with a glowing vitae of career accomplishments suggesting rock solid credibility, even though one click on a link provided brings a reader to questions about what "objects" hit the WTC Towers, and essays ridiculing Prof. Steven Jones, even calling him 'retarded.'"
What I find even more amazing is that a website like PatriotsQuestion911 won't remove people like Reynolds when other activists will refuse to join the site because they don't want to be associated with the "stuff" that comes with him.
Figure it out already.
_______________
Arabesque: 911 Truth
Morgan Reynolds - nuff said.
Morgan Reynolds - nuff said.
Our movement...
Requires credibility, and Morgan simply doesn't have it.
Who Is? Archives
What are you trying to say?
What are you trying to say? "Ex" Bush Administration Reynolds is a TOTAL disinfo shill.
"Do you have any evidence that Dr. Reynolds presence on the patriots site has kept other's from joining. Maybe it has but our movement requires science, not conjecture."
^ What? Are you defending him here?
Not defending him
People are attacking him using conjecture . . . guilt by association . . . I simply asked that people provide links so that I and others can research.
I do believe that Fox chose Dr. Reynolds because he looks and sounds nuts . . . but they don't have to work very hard to convince their audience that we're all a bunch of nuts.
Peace.
links?
When someone says to an audience of millions that "cartoons" hit the WTC, what more links do you really need?
Here are just a few -
The Special Case of Morgan Reynolds and David Shayler
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/patriots_question/index.html#members
Interpreting the Boeing-767 Deceleration During Impact with the WTC Tower:
Center of Mass Versus Tail-end Motion, and Instantaneous Versus Average Velocity
Gregory S. Jenkins, PhD; April 11, 2007
Journal of 9/11 Studies
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/Boeing767DecelerationTowers.pdf
Letter added to A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories
Eric Salter; March 21, 2007
Journal of 9/11 Studies
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/LetterAddedtoACriticalReviewofWTC...
A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories; Eric Salter;
Journal of 9/11 Studies
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200610/Salter.pdf
A Critical Review of Morgan Reynolds'
Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?
"Reynolds' article, which combines strong theories with erroneous ones, is a microcosm of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Experience has shown that the mainstream media will amplify the least credible and most offensive theories and misrepresent them as gospel of the 'conspiracy theorists.'"
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/reynolds/
alexjonesfan, I want you to listen to this.
Two rockin' hours of Jim Fetzer, an attack interview with Steven Jones!
Note how Fetzer softens up Steven Jones, implying that nukes were used at the WTC. Note how he acts "surprised" when Morgan Reynolds calls in and attacks Jones with a coordinated effort that included front-paging an article on the old Scholars site, by Judy Wood. Fetzer says that "we" put the article up. That would be Fetzer/Wood.
No conjecture here, no speculation. Jones was set up for a live on the air attack.
Now what do you think of Mr. Reynolds?
Hour 1
Hour 2
I used to have these posted at putfile.com. But someone had them pulled. Can't imagine why. The 45:40 mark in the second hour is when it gets interesting. But you really should listed to the whole enchilada.
Attempts to reframe "standards" as "censorship" are getting old
Just saying.
______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
Hmmm..interesting comment
I've said standards shouldn't be confused with censorship--didn't say anything about myself being the only one to set them.
______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
Who else sets them?
If you don't solely set the standards then who does? What are their credentials? I'm willing to follow experts?
Your blogspot has you down as Canadian and your profile here states Pacific Northwest? Where are you really, now?
Your chattty use of "cheers" and "bloody" gives you up as having some kind of English past! What military were you in?
You seem a pretty good prospect for disinfo, yourself?
...don't believe them!
give me a break
Apparently a high-profile former Bush Admin official who openly discredits our entire 9/11 community and personally attacks one of our best researchers isn't much to discuss compared to Jenny's blog posts?
Looks like another transparent effort to try to refocus the discussion onto personal aspects of those who expose the real disinfo on here.
Yet the fact remains that more and more people agree with Jenny and others like her, doing similar work.
Nice post Reprehensor, too.
They never listen the first 10 times
I've covered this topic enough online, repeatedly, in various forums, both legit and shill. If you can't be bothered to read each others memos, it's not my look out.
Right, I confess--I'm SAS. *roll eyes*
FYI--the Pacific Northwest includes Canada.
______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/