in your 32 weeks and 1 day of being a member, your objection comes off a little more than suspect to me.

http://911blogger.com/user/2858

I'm curious to know what your "smoking gun" evidence is for 9/11 being an inside job. I'm gambling on that it has to do with TV FAKERY. But I wouldn't know for sure since you've contributed absolutely nothing to this website regarding your 9/11 views.

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your post above, but when it comes from a member who has not participated on this website at all (unless you're using a sock puppet), I find it more objectionable than "name calling".

The "disinfo clowns" that DBLS speaks of who put this video together deserve nothing less IMO.

However, I do view the rooftop explosions as more evidence (not that we need anymore) of controlled demolition.

But I also view this as an attempt by the disinfo clowns to reestablish credibility with people who aren't aware of their past (and current) behavior on the internet of promoting the most wacked-out and debunked theories like "beams from space" taking down the twin towers, to cartoon / no planes at the WTC. I also view this video as an attempt to discredit controlled demolition theories, knowing that people who view this video will stumble upon their other "research" and videos posted on websites like youtube.

I personally have been victimized by this disinfo team you are defending who are associated with this video's "inspiration". Not physically, but a victim of identity theft. Myself and some others on this website exposed some of these frauds who were spamming 911Blogger with their usual BS, proving that their bogus theories weren't true one by one, and shortly afterward I discovered that one of them stole my moniker and began posting those theories under it (If you Google stallion4, the first hit that comes up is for a video channel with dozens of no planer videos and other bizarre stuff posted on it. But I digress).

The persons who made this video have no interest in truth or justice. They're only interested in mucking up the waters and making it harder on those who are truly working toward those things.

____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!" -Dr. Frank Greening

David Duke right on the front page.

Enlightening...

If you're defending Siegel then your comments are 100% ironic and hypocritical because that joker has done nothing but attack and "name call" great people like Dr Jones and GW from this site amongst others. Aside from that he pushes clear as day disinfo garbage, "space beams and mini nukes" brought down the Towers, after "no planes" hit them according to Siegel. The guy also sabotaged 911mysterys claiming copyright infringement and got it taken down from google video for a brief period - now is that what a genuine truther would do? Or is that that type of behaviour a Cointelpro-esq style shill would engage in? I call the later.

Like during the KW hoax controversy. Tarpley's supporters could have done with a message like this.

______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/

Clearly you are hear to work certain grievances,

I do not agree with anything you have said, and to be totally frank, I am not even interested in your opinion about it in the first place.

My comment is about how you and others like you are destroying the value of this site by making every topic into something about your BS personal grievances and to spread your name calling.

Why don't you put up a post where you discuss those topics with people who are interested in them and stop polluting every other posting with your accusations and name calling?

Give us a friggin break already.

From who, if you don't mind my asking? Or where?

"Half of the comments on this page are nothing but name calling and attempts to discredit certain people."

By "certain people", are you talking about Ricky? Cause he's discredited himself ages ago, mate. Just the way it is. ;-)

______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/