I have been trying to help Sander call attention to this story: http://911blogger.com/node/12156
This is one of the many loose ends that could help unravel 9/11 if we yank hard enough. Since we all have to Be The Media these days, we need to start thinking and working like real investigative reporters, as Sander does, rather than just sitting around opinionating. (I don't exclude myself from the implied criticism.) Thanks for posting this, Reprehensor.

John A MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE

since December 2001 I have heard so many different angles on 911. Some are easier to prove and others not. Take the physics of the collapse of WTC7 where we have so many scientific ways of understanding the destruction.

But stories like the above one are not so much physical but relationships between people. How can you check up what is true and what is not ?

When I have the time I will follow up this story but I still have not convinced my colleagues that the WTC collapses where not due to aeroplanes colliding into the towers. Today a colleagues said I was impossible when I say that planes did not make the buildings collapse in the WTC. But I again said to him no plane hit WTC7 !

Can you imagine that I will now start talking about this story !

I am not going to be disperse my energy on this. The WTC7 collapse will have my focus.

Yours John