Blogads

Blogads

Asbestos Dangers



Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.

FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.

Get the news, get the facts.

User login

RSS Feeds


Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


Philly 9/11 Truth Confronts the Clairvoyant Rick Santorum on New 9/11 Prediction

( Home » blogs » Temple911Truth's blog » Philly 9/11 Truth... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by Temple911Truth on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 6:27am.

Philly 9/11 Truth Confronts Rick Santorum (Short Clip 10 min)

Philly 9/11 Truth Confronts Rick Santorum*** (Extended Clip 20 min)

Philly 9/11 Truth Confronts the Clairvoyant Rick Santorum on New 9/11 Prediction
Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum operating under the auspices of David Horowitz’ Islamo-fascism Awareness Week entered the halls of Philadelphia’s Temple University to deliver a trenchant warning about the increasing threat of Islamo-fascism. Santorum arrogantly anticipating resistance from the “left leaning” university issued a disclaimer that he would extend equal time after his presentation to discussing the positions therein and to his credit such was realized. The question and answer session began with the bizarre monologue of a gentleman claiming to have been at Ground Zero on 9/11 and also that he was marine and victim of Islamo-fascism as a peaceful political protestor in Andalucia (see extended clip). The majority of the questions posed by the audience to Satorum were woefully uninspiring. One comment however did resonate which was in regards to the loss of civil liberties since 9/11 and spurred a telling conversation in which Santorum denied that any such loss of liberty had occurred telling an audience member to give a “real example” despite the issue of libraries being forced to disclose information on their clients being mentioned. Members of Philadelphia 9/11 Truth were able to interpolate a few extremely critical inquiries into the fiasco the most important of which Santorum’s prediction of some “unfortunate events” that would in the near future change the political opinion of the majority of Americans. Mark Peters, seasoned veteran of Philly 9/11 Truth went word for word with the sophist Santorum who attempted to spin the question about his ominous prediction into a question about Mark’s personal view of Islamo-fascism. Santorum was able to bide his time long enough to formulate a rebuttal stating that his forewarning was about the Iranian threat which in Satorum’s analysis “already has begun” to initiate this political shift. Santorum took additional questions from Philly 9/11 Truth’s members Darrell Rowlands and Nick Carangi, respectively about the euphemistic use of the term “Islamo-fascism” and about the role of covert CIA operations in the fostering of Islamic extremism. Satorum insisted that Islamo-fascism was a proper term due to the nature of the meld between religion and state, however audience members agreed that fascism was inherently about corporatism. Although Santorum anticipated resistance to his melodramatic inculcations by hubristically planning for an extended discussion session, the actions of these courageous Philly 9/11 Truth members invariably prevented him from further deleterious chicanery.

» login to post comments | 6 points

Good, but I'd say your questions were too weak/vague for the

barefaced liar, Santorum.

BTW, this Islamo-fascism propaganda is disgusting! I'd like to see how far a Judeo-fascism or Christo-fascism week would get?! Not very far, because it's fine to bash Muslims, but not Jews or Christians.

Submitted by Colombo on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 11:22am.
» login to post comments | 8 points

He got you!

Question- "Do you think 'islamo-fascism' is a threat to America"?
Answer- "No, I think 'islamo-fascism' is a lie created by you and your FASCIST buddys,. to instill terror in Americans. So you can take from them their freedoms and their childrens money (war debt!)."

The seconod guy was right,. FASCISM is state domination by military and corporate power,. What these propagandists are calling 'islamo-fascism' is islamic fundamentalism/nationalism,. the reason they don't like or use this term, is that a large part of their supporters (the retarded part) are fundamentalist/nationalist christians and jews and so the term 'islamo-fascism' was invented to add negativity to the word islam and link it to something that most people have negative thoughts of,. Fascism.

The interesting thing is that these PNAC-neocon -Loonies attempt (and seem to succeed) in shifting all their common traits onto their created symbolic boogymen,. Listen to bush or cheney etc. whenever they talk of the terrorists they speak as if they know the thoughts in their heads,. why is that? well since they ARE the terrorists they do know the the thoughts in their own heads! and they can speak them with out lieing, . "they hate our freedom, they want to destroy america, they killed 3000 people", etc. all true,. the PNAC terrorists have all these traits. They just flip the script and talk about the "boogyman" as if its not them,. and is someone out there,. where the oil and the markets, and geo-stratigical locations are.

We all know who is really funding and equiping, and in times of need, activating 'real' islamic fundamentalist/nationalistic terrorist, it is the CIA or the new 'private' manipulators,. . this is well documented. and is now obviouse to anyone who cares to look into it.

Submitted by jph_wacheski on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 11:30am.
» login to post comments | 6 points

Agreed - Mr. Santorm opened the door for a full expose'

of the alternative (and far more plausible) explanation of the events of 9/11/01.

I would follow your short answer with: "Sir, even the FBI now admits that they have "no hard evidence linking bin Laden to 9/11", so why did we illegally invade and continue to occupy Afghanistan in response to 9/11? Could it have had anything to do with the $50 billion/year heroin trade that has flourished since our arrival there or the gas pipelines that Enron desperately needed to run to the electrical generating plants they were building in India, which that company had recklessly gambled and lost on?"

I could go on, of course, but it is far easier to come up with these lines sitting at home than when you have to think on your feet in the heat of "battle". Preparation is always key, one can never prepare too much.

Thanks for also using some of your limited time to bring up the plight of the first responders, this should be SOP (maybe even the first questions, too) whenever we confront the public face of the perps. I often wish we had more chances in CA to take these clowns on.

I give the blog, and the effort, a 10.

Keep up the good work!

(We really need to recruit some more young women to ask the tough questions, as this will totally catch them off guard.)

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Submitted by LeftWright on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 2:16pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

Yes,

a lot of twist speak and twisting of word-definitions.
Maybe it's a good idea to ask (on video) what people mean with their
definitions (in this case islamo-fascism).

These words indeed seem only to be made up to be effective in scapegoeting and to sound
impressive or evil!

Submitted by FredHendrik on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 2:20pm.
» login to post comments | 6 points

When you ask a question, DEMAND AN ANSWER

Don't let them side-track you with questions yourself. THEY are the ones answering the questions, NOT YOU.

Next time this happens, just point that out and demand they answer.

Submitted by theFacts on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 12:56pm.
» login to post comments | 4 points

This is a productive thread:

The audience participants who asked the questions, the commentaries, all complied a great group dynamic for education in many areas such as orator skills (not from Santorum), finesse, and constructive focused input. A good learning experience. Thanks.

Submitted by joann on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 1:21pm.
» login to post comments | 4 points

Thank You Philly 9/11 Truth!

Thanks for bringing this video to 911blogger.com. Santorum shows his ability to spin talking points, but seems without empathy! He was surprisingly agile at thinking on his feet, which seems exceptional for someone who was in AC/DC? It seemed a game--a debating contest--to him? He's dangerous in my opinion!

Yeah, there's been no perceptible loss of liberties to date--but that could change at a moment's notice! It will happen the day that Marshall Law has been declared! You have to ask, is Pakistan a dry run? You have to wonder about Musharraf's reference to Abraham Lincoln in his emergency speech? Did they slip him the wrong speech? I tend to believe these inclusions are done on purpose for those able to read between the lines! It's part of their game!

We're already a surveillance state slouching towards a security state! Santorum seems to counter with MSM virtual reality arguments--there's been no real changes made--just go on with your lives! It's our everyday routines that will be our undoing! Will you one day just wake up and find that most of your neighbors are gone? Will you accept the explanation that they possibly all moved away? This is the type of argument Santorum is offering! You haven't been touched--yet--so just forget about it!

I'm always impressed by the efforts to bring these encounters to video. It's easy to second guess what could be asked, but I was satisfied with the questions posed! Santorum knows about the "unfortunate events" that will change people's minds, because he knows the agenda! I'm just glad he's not in DC!
We've got to look to Spain's reaction to their 3/11, they didn't buy it! There's the example that we should follow!

Santorum is more proof...

...don't buy what they are selling!

Submitted by alllans2k7 on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 2:15pm.
» login to post comments | 6 points

Great job Patriots. My only

Great job Patriots. My only critical comment would be to be more confident and assertive with your stance and questioning. Look Rick in the eye and realize that you are addressing a criminal. No need to shout at him, but perhaps think of how the police might be interrogating a criminal suspect. Taking an controlled and assertive stance establishes credibility for anyone listening. You already have the Truth on your side and people will listen to it if if appears to be from a credible source.

Submitted by greenback on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 3:38pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

Islam-o-Fascism

This is a quick behavioral psychology tip for everyone. The phrase Islam-o-fascism is more state sponsored "classical conditioning". Please google "classical conditioning" to understand it. They are pairing a neutral word, islam, with a negative word, fascism. This is the simplest form of conditioning. When someone thinks of fascism it only has negative connotations. This is why it is being paired with islam which is a religion. The stimulus being conditioned is "islam" the previously conditioned (through exposure and experience) word facism is the emotion eliciting stimlus. The emotional response is the unconditioned response. For more info look up Dr. Bruce Weiss's 1968 study on Classical conditiong and persuasion (of attitudes) within the journal of Psychonomic Sciences. I'll try to get a copy scanned and put in pdf form at some point. This particular study is short and would also make for good pamphleting if some one else can beat me to it.

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)
OIL IS OBSOLETE - WAKE UP - YOU'VE BEEN LIED TO, AGAIN!
http://www.waterfuelcell.org/

Submitted by Whitey on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 5:11am.