Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Blogads

Loose Change: An American Coup DVD

User login

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


Open letter to Popular Mechanics - Prove your ludicrous 9/11 theories in public

( Home » blogs » 911insidejob's blog » Open letter to... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by 911insidejob on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 2:56pm.
|

By J A Blacker
RINF Alternative News

Direct challenge to “Popular Mechanics” - Show us the Physics & Maths to back up your ludicrous & “physically impossible” 911 gravity collapse assertions.

Go here to read the letter in full

It is physically impossible for the strongest, heaviest and (3 times working design load) bottom 80+ floors to offer near zero resistance to the falling floors except when there is a controlled demolition. Period!

If 6 months from the date of this formal public challenge (Saturday, 06 October 2007) “Popular Mechanics” Magazine can not reproducibly demonstrate a falling body taking the path of greatest resistance as a result of Gravity alone, then it is Ample evidence to everyone that the Popular Mechanics Magazine assertion that Gravity alone could destroy the twin towers and building 007 at near freefall speed IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE “Popular Myth” & deliberate “Popular Mechanics” DECEPTION or indeed honest misunderstanding Re the laws of Physics.

The following is a direct challenge to Popular Mechanics to prove their claims in public, do they have enough faith in their research to make it public?

Read the entire letter here http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/open-letter-to-popular-mechanics-prov...

» login to post comments | 4 points

Good idea, but 6 months is

Good idea, but 6 months is too long. They are the experts on this topic supposedly, lets get the evidence on the table now!

Submitted by Somebigguy on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 3:26pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

***FAO*** SBG / 911blogger admins...

Sorry for the O/T comment - please delete after reading

Just a quick query regarding QUOTES

I submitted a few a while back and was wondering whether anyone was processing new quotes...

Sorry for the prod, just a quick heads-up incase it's an oversight.

Many thanks and best wishes

Submitted by 911veritas on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 3:48pm.
» login to post comments | 2 points

Ha!! I guess those are

Ha!! I guess those are sitting in a moderation queue somewhere, I'll try to find them...

Submitted by Somebigguy on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 8:18pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Damn!

That was good! I agree 6 months is to long. Besides it's been six years..They already had enough time.
Ill bet a thousand bucks it does'nt happen.

Submitted by WISDOM on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 5:56pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

mmmmm...

if this made it to the front page of all u.s papers and the date went unanswered.........
pity they own the papers.

my children are not cannon fodder for the n.w.o.

Submitted by able on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 7:53pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

I'm sorry "able" but

I just can't seem to get the knowledge about what could be a "u.s. paper"! Is it a kind of lie supplier for the people to read and not getting the news they need to understand the world in wich they live? Papers are liars. So why would they publish anykind of truth?

Drummerboy
**********************************************************
You can't hide a lie for long. Truth shall come out.

Submitted by Drummerboy on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 9:39pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Has this been...

submitted officially to Popular Mechanics? Have they responded to this in anyway? If not we should do that.

Submitted by KNOWAR on Thu, 10/11/2007 - 11:58pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

It's a slow process but

It's a slow process but worth it to make sure everything water tight.

There is no debating the evidence (laws of physics) which is why I guess it's taken so long to check, recheck and check again to make sure 100% there is no mistakes in the maths.

Also these are the same guys that are taking the BBC to court for lying to the public for the last 6 years.

Submitted by 911insidejob on Fri, 10/12/2007 - 3:33am.