"Amerika Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation

Blogads

Banner Exchange

"Amerika Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

Submitted by Carol Brouillet on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 10:25am.

History Repeats

"Amerika Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation

Captain Eric H. May

October 1, 2007
Peter Guenther's Prologue

The most persuasive anti-Nazi I ever knew was my mentor, Dr. Peter W. Guenther, who believed that Nazism was monstrous at every level. As a professor of humanities, he thought it was both inhumane and inhuman. As a professor of art history he thought its aesthetics were artless histrionics. He readily granted that his intellectual opinions were molded by his personal experiences. As a German veteran of World War II, he regretted the loss of his youth, the waste of his friends' lives and the devastation that they had inflicted on others. He held Hitler accountable for all of this -- after all, it was Hitler who had drafted them into the war. He had served from 1939 to 1945, from Poland to Norway to France to Russia. He once quipped that before every one of their invasions their leaders said they were fighting for national defense, but after the shooting started every soldier on every side believed that he was fighting for his own self-defense.

By the time of the Iraq war he was retired from academe, and I was writing military analysis for media. As US forces began storming up the Euphrates Valley in the spring of 2003, hell-bent on Baghdad, we began to discuss the limited American mobilized manpower and materiel, and the overall limitations of blitz tactics. Guided by his insights, I published a then-radical op-ed in the Houston Chronicle that predicted a quicksand war in Iraq, and maybe a world war as a result of it.

As the easy war promised us by the Bush administration wore on into the summer of 2003, Dr. Guenther and I began to note that there were more similarities between Post-9/11 America and Third Reich Germany than just over-reliance on Blitzkrieg tactics. We finally determined that the two nations were following parallel political courses. Most disturbing for my mentor, who had become a patriotic American citizen after World War II, was the painful conclusion that our American president, with his global war for a New American Century, was just another German fuhrer, with a world war for a Thousand Year Reich. "This is a bad copy of a bad original," he said.

"Drang Nach Ost" -- The Eastern Offensive

George W. Bush came into office with a secret war plan and no excuse to implement it -- just as Hitler had come into office in 1933 with the same predicament. Both of them wanted the prize of Middle Eastern oil. In Hitler's case that meant going through "Judeo-Bolshevik" Russia on the way, while in Bush's case that meant going through "Islamo-Fascist" Iraq. In Hitler's case the guiding document was Mein Kampf, while in Bush's case there were two. A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm was presented to the Israeli government in 1996 by American neocons Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and David Wurmser, among others. Restructuring America's Defenses was presented to the American government in 2000. Its arguments mirrored the Israeli document, and had been drawn up by the neocons as well. In 2001 Feith, Perle and Wurmser became key Bush administration members.

Neither Hitler's nor Bush's plans for world dominance could have been pursued without some good luck, though. Both leaders entered office with over half their nations opposing them, and an avid opposition that wanted to pull them down. Hitler's good luck came with the Reichstag fire, blamed on Jewish Communists, which mobilized his fatherland to rally behind him. Bush's good luck happened on 9/11, blamed on Muslim Fundamentalists, which mobilized his homeland to rally behind him.

In both cases, their followers smiled at their good luck, and began their new order of things. Hitler quickly instituted an Enabling Act for the protection of the German people, slated for expiration in five years, which was quietly continued. Bush quickly instituted a Patriot Act for the protection of the American people, slated for expiration in five years, which was quietly continued. Hitler created the Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo) to further protect the German people, while Bush created the Homeland Security Agency (Homeseca) to do the same for the American people.

"Fuhrer Prinzip" -- The Unitary Executive

Both leaders were believers in the authoritarian concept. A few weeks before assuming office, Bush said outright that he thought dictatorship would be a fine form of government, if he could be the dictator. They both believed that power should come from above and obedience should come from below, and they offered protection in exchange for loyalty. Thus no one was surprised when Hermann Goering made a fortune helping to run Germany, just as no one was surprised when Irving "Scooter" Libby received a pardon for his pro-Bush political crimes in America.

Both leaders supplemented their new security police and security acts with concentration camps such as Dachau and Gitmo, initially designed for only a small percentage of national enemies. Both dispensed with international rules and regulations in their treatment of enemies in those installations, and applied a wide variety of innovative persuasive techniques to extract information and obtain confessions. The lessons learned in these proto-type camps proved to be invaluable in later establishments such as Auschwitz and Abu Ghraib.

Both leaders relied on agreeable legislatures. In Germany the Reichstag cheered enthusiastically as it endorsed the increase in police powers, the reduction in civil rights and the national march to world war. In America Congress did the same things, but in more subdued fashion, even with a show of dissent. In Germany, Hitler declared a dictatorship under Article 48, provided by the old Weimar Constitution for the event of a national emergency. In America Bush recently created National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD 51), thereby legalizing a dictatorship in the event of a national emergency.

"Gott Mit Uns" -- God's on Our Side

Neither Hitler nor Bush could have effected their radical plans without a party full of functionaries and a compliant national media, of course. Hitler relied on his "Nazi" party, a word derived from the name of his National Socialist organization. He had a brilliant individual named Joseph Goebbels to control the Reich Propaganda Ministry and rally the public behind Nazi policies. Bush relied on his "Nozi" party, a word derived from "Zionism," with the first four letters Z-i-o-n remixed into N-o-z-i. He had a brilliant cartel of Zionists to control the American Mainstream Media and rally the public behind Nozi policies.

The greatest accomplishment of both the Nazi and Nozi parties was convincing themselves and their citizens that they were not conspirators of any sort, but rather the victims of an international conspiracy. The Nazi party never tired of saying that Judeo-Communism was the hidden enemy, against which all the powers of a determined fatherland had to be directed, and that they were the targets of anti-German propaganda. The Nozi party never tires of saying that Islamo-Fascism is the hidden enemy, against which all the powers of a determined homeland have to be directed, and that they are the targets of anti-Semitic propaganda.

The rest of the world didn't buy the pro-war propaganda from Germany's Nazis three generations ago, and they don't buy it from America's Nozis three generations later. The way the rest of the world sees it, what we have been taught to call the axis of evil is not so dangerous to the world as the axis of America and Israel. They see American naval forces massing in the name of national defense against Iran, and they remember Iraq. They see Israeli air forces attacking Syria, and they remember Lebanon. The rest of the world knows who we have become, even if we don't.

Peter Guenther's Epilogue: He died in 2005, and was followed by his wife Andrea six months later. They had been married for 58 years, and had been American citizens for more than 50. For more about my friendship with them, refer to the first and fourth volumes of my 2003 Iraq war correspondence here.

» Carol Brouillet's blog | login to post comments | printer friendly version

» login to post comments | 3 points

Your Tax Dollars at

Your Tax Dollars at work...
--
The 9/11 Truth B-Team

Submitted by imgstacke on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 4:55pm.

» login to post comments | -5 points

What a Reaction!!!!

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

When I questioned Noam Chomsky about 9/11, back in 2002, waving the first issue of Global Outlook in my hand, in front of 1000 people, although he basically dismissed all the "evidence" as "not credible," he did mention the Reichstag Fire. It remains, I believe, the best historical parallel to the events of 9/11 and the majority of Americans probably have no idea about the conviction of Prescott Bush under the Trading with the Enemies Act. However this excellent image, created by Deception Dollar artist, Blaine Machan (which I've used on countless flyers) does provoke completely irrational, emotional responses from some people.

While I have consistently received 10s on my postings- this post which miraculously appeared on page one (usually they are ignored and stay on my remote blog unread) got a "one" and now has hardly moved up to a "three" but brought me down in blogger ratings substantially while being identified as a target and labelled "anti-Jewish" or "anti-Semitic."

I must admit that Captain Eric May has a very unusual style, and a very colorful background, an almost unbelievable background, but I think he is very sincere in recognizing false flag operations and the intentiona and capacity of our government to stage another false flag operation- should they think that they could get away with it.

On my show with Connie Fogal and Bev Collins about the protests against the SPP and the NAU, Bev mentioned that the guy who was behind the whole thing, working with other corporate elites, put in their own documents damning statements, much like the Project for a New American Century's "Only a catastrophic and catalyzing event like a New Pearl Harbour..." would facilitate the military transformation that they wanted to happen. Well, to get a North American Union, the corporate honchos feel that they will have to have another 9/11... The only way to stop them is to educate the public and the military, and those who might be in a position to stop it.

Captain May's efforts might have spared us a 2nd 9/11 in Texas, in Chicago, in Portland, and another 2B 9/11. We may never know. Maybe all those nukes flying around the US, in violation of standard operating procedures, was an innocent fluke- but that seems awfully unlikely.

I do think that the government hopes to paralyze us with fear, and would like for us to hush up and be quiet, and go along with their agenda. I do think anyone willing to stand up and question them, raise the censored issues, get out the censored facts, show courage, will help encourage others to speak up. The more light we cast upon the dark secrets, plots, crimes of the regime, the less power they have to get others to do their bidding.

While Sophie and her brother died for disseminating the leaflets of the White Rose, they nurtured a movement, which actually nonviolently took over cities in Germany, and triumphed over the Nazis, which didn't get much coverage in history books.

Now is the time to speak up and point out the pattern, now is the time to stop it from repeating again.

Carol Brouillet
http://www.communitycurrency.org

Submitted by Carol Brouillet on Tue, 10/02/2007 - 2:56am.

» login to post comments | -6 points

I'm at a loss too, Carol:

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

I've had to read this three times, trying my damnedest to locate the unequivocal "jew hate" of the presenter's presenter presenting a presentation.

Trying to locate the numerology, trying to locate the "absence of anti-zionist" notation (searching for a positive double negative to prove a nonnegative of a negative). Trying to locate the absence of a parallel adequately inaccurate to warrant an up-score for accuracy not present incase there is parallel non-notable notable.

"If it has no jew-hate but fails the test of presenting adequate jew-hate in an historical re-narrative of Zionist self-jew-hate then it MUST THEREFOR be evidence of jew-hater non anti-semite negitive-Zionator self-loath peace-waring."

This shit is serious schizophrenic para-politics by those I MUST SAY... whom FORWARD continue to use the phrase "Anti-Semite" without qualification. Non-semite-anti-semite-jew-hate-not, or jew-hate by not-enough-evidence-of-jew-love-must-be-a-hater. The kind of people who feed this shit are seriously off their rocker... jew, christian, moslem or Jew, Christian, Moslem... I don't care what you want to call yourself or who you think is best least worthy of you non-support anti-hate double-plus good not good.

Carol... I do so wish they would drop such crap. Btb, love ya... love the d-dollars too. Thanks.

"Anti-Semite" really only works if one is asked to be clear which particular side of Warring Semites are actually on the block today warranting proper anti-ness. Your detractors and down-voters may be seriously scrabbling over one another to best locate the source of your inaccurate non-notable in context of article discussing the machinations of anti-anti- not enough anti-anti to prove proper placement and hating not enough hate of hate to be hate-able.

There are several comments below as well, making steadfast and burrowing mental mind-locks into what's been said (but not shown to be not-said said), offering reference and to non-reference for reference and out-right fucking endless scavenger hunting for the said not-said said therefor must have said to be so on and so therefore "I know this that and then some" as evidence not shown to prove non-evidence-non.

To Carol's detractors:

Sophistry: The Art of saying nothing, to prove something is proof of a nothing something. The Sophist lays, without aid, the complete tasks of comprehension back upon the one first asking for aid.

The Sophist: A Coward of the highest order.

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Tue, 10/02/2007 - 9:29am.

» login to post comments | -7 points

I'm big dumb stupid with poopy pants, please help.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Is jew and Israeli same thing?

What difference is between The Temple vs. a synagogue?

Pushed words must be same persons belief, right?

Does a truth-not make history lie or history make lie truth never?

Did long past world hate joooz cause joooooz not hate self more that world make Zion home to none so jooz make leave all else in plastine to make non-faithful jooz Homeland apartment?

I'm big dumb got poop in pants and hands smell doodo cuz no person help my clean self.

Womens of Zion army cute sexy... I want more sex women like Zion army hot, must be good.

(Dear More Discerning Reader: I grew up in both the anabaptist church (a faith in the message of Jesus only AFTER informed adult choice), AND the non-"Temple" synagogue (a jewish faith in one g*d and love to be shared like free knowledge to any and all those who ask honest questions the world over). Call it luck or what ever you want, but the chance happenstance that I could experience these two faiths several steps removed from their Original Faiths spread by MSM and INTENSELY dogmatic Religious propaganda, is a blessing to me which truly challenges my adult spiritual agnosticism.

It hardly seems controversial to charge that ALL Religion is a most repugnant mind-fuck perpetrated against the innocent by practitioners of the most dark of dark mind-fucking Arts. Yet if proof that in this mortal coil exists those who take something resembling Satin into their heart is what the we godly-undecided in this world need, simply look directly into the eyes of Religion's Apologetics whom are yet to concede they ass rape the minds of innocents with their Godless bullshit.

Because I did learnt good, that an open mind aids beyond measure the ability for one to see dastardly and divine with ever improving clarity and focus... chancing then upon Muhammad's singular word, untainted by his lessor's bigoted non-repeating, is yet again another singing voice of a god-like love that can be heard by all whom choose not instead to fill their ears with silver.

If I was a religious kinda guy, I'd say something like "bless you all", but I'm not. For me, there are still far too many bastard pieces of shit who walk around this place with impregnable devilishness only too happy to capitalize upon such a universal hall-pass. For those types I must say; "suck my tail pipe and choke to death." You know who you are. Now quick, down vote this so I can bitch JG for not petitioning away the rating system.

Btb: What make you of this quote signed "Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA":

"Folks throw around the term "antisemite" quite liberally, much the way that
in my part of the country (the South) they used to throw around the word
"nigger lover." The latter phrase, "nigger lover" literally meant someone
who had sex with black folks, but came to mean anyone who didn't hold to
Southern orthodoxy on things like segregation and racial supremacy of
whites. Similarly, "antisemite" should properly be understood as a view
that semites (Jews being one variety) are inherently, genetically, disposed
to thoughts and actions that make them odious to other races. I don't
subscribe to this view, and am in fact quite liberal on matters of race.
Much to the chagrin of folks who would like to make me, a six-foot tall
Aryan martial artist, a proto-SS type, I'm actually married to a Creole
(mixed race) wife and prefer the company of black badasses to white wimps.
Having said that, I believe that the social phenomenon of Jewish
"us-vs.-them" thinking and acting is unmistakable, and is commonly called
Zionism. The attempt to make the term "antisemite" resound against anyone
who dares to question the motives or machinations of Zionists is nothing
more or less than a variation of the kind of nonsensical labeling that once
went on widely in Dixie with the term "nigger lover.")

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Tue, 10/02/2007 - 9:46pm.

» login to post comments | -5 points

Dearest Nameless Comment-less Cowards:

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 2:59am.

» login to post comments | -6 points

All I can I say

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Nunyabiz on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 8:40am.

» login to post comments | -5 points

'Come out come out wherever you are....'

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 4:26pm.

» login to post comments | -4 points

Talking about not talking about this article...

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 10:22am.

» login to post comments | -3 points

"If you're not taking flak, airmen...

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 10:21pm.

» login to post comments | -4 points

Hummm... sharp and immediate, warm and cozy.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 10:31pm.

» login to post comments | 8 points

Will Eric May and Webster Tarpley denounce this?

Or do they support accusing a 9/11 activist of being the leader of an al Qaeda cell and calling for her rendition and torture? Is this what they hoped would happen when they announced on Tarpley's September 27 broadcast that Col. Jenny Sparks is a "cointelpro agent"? How low are Tarpley, May and company planning to go?

Thanks to Midnighter at truthaction.org for the screenshot.

All street addresses and phone numbers have been removed.

The above is posted alongside another fictitious but none-too-subtly-threatening headline: 9/11 Conspiracy Researcher Murdered

One week earlier:

TARPLEY: Last question: in one word - do you know who she is and where she is?

MAY: Alas, no, but we suspect Portland - at least that has been put out in a number of places. We haven't been able to corroborate it.

Submitted by JoanJones on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 6:12am.

» login to post comments | -3 points

I can't F'ing stand Webster Tarpley...

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 12:04pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

I have no interest in your ad hominem attacks

Apparently no one else does either judging by the lack of response to your many belligerent posts above.

I will note that your continued ranting about witch hunts and red guards etc comes off as empty hyprocritical posturing in the face of your distinct lack of concern regarding actual ongoing and increasingly menacing attacks on truth activists (complete with street addresses and phone numbers).

Submitted by JoanJones on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 12:53pm.

» login to post comments | 3 points

LOL--Nico muddling around in the dark like always

Seems this Josephus is a real person--at least the address is real.

(You have to go to the blog to see it)

Whether he knows John Albanese is another kettle of fish.
______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Submitted by Col. Jenny Sparks on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 2:22pm.

» login to post comments | 5 points

And Nico's not alone

Eric May, Morgan Stack and Webster Tarpley are muddling around in the dark right along with him. Not to mention the video production team that has managed to pack youtube with at least 20 videos similar to the following one - all attacking you, Cosmos, truthaction.org and other activists. I guess the FBI and Ford Foundation accusations didn't get much traction? So now they're moving right along to the al Qaeda cell accusations.

One thing's for sure: someone's putting a lot of time, energy and money into these ongoing attacks.

GeorgeWashington and 911Blogger are "exposed" in this one too.

"WEBSTER TARPLEY MORGAN STACK AND CAPT ERIC MAY EXPOSE WQ2RX"

Special note to the "just ignore it" crowd: 9/11 truth activists are being targeted as al Qaeda cell members and their supposed personal information is being posted in dozens of videos and on multiple attack sites. What is it going to take for you to wake up?

Submitted by JoanJones on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 7:08pm.

» login to post comments | -5 points

Yawn.... my name is Erin.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 7:08pm.

» login to post comments | 13 points

Captain Eric H. May...

Former army 'intelligence'...

An evident 'Jew' hater...

Spewing WWI - II Propaganda of the Allied supporters on how evil those Nazi's were & not one mention of the Zionist role...

He's got one thing right, not much has changed. That's what the Zionist / Neocon Rothschild's & Rockefeller's want.

Sorry, Carol, I mean no offense, but this guy smells of disinfo.

http://www.the7thfire.com/9-11/Pastore_Investigation_of_%209-11/chapter_...

Submitted by Big_D on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 5:02pm.

» login to post comments | 13 points

Who supports the work of Captain May?

"In Ireland David Ray Griffin's appearance was canceled and he was labeled anti-Semetic due to posts by "Captain Eric May" being featured on Morgan Stack's 911truth.ie website.
May is yet another 'former' intelligence person who advocates numerology to expose the 9-11 coverup.
May is openly anti-Semetic, describing the media and Hollywood as 'controlled by the Jews'."
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/911mysteries/appeal.html

Submitted by Arabesque on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 6:28pm.

» login to post comments | 5 points

Captain May--in his own words-- on Tarpley's GCN show

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2359

______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Submitted by Col. Jenny Sparks on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 1:18am.

» login to post comments | -5 points

Dear Arabesque and Jenny:

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 12:44pm.

» login to post comments | 6 points

And that's why I don't get this 'tude of yours, chum

"Jenny, our good times had poking sticks at Wick and Roberts in the eye... I must admit that was fun, for awhile."

You jumped right into that shite--and it was no where near as serious as this shite is now.

These bitches are digging around--however inexpertly--for our personal information because we bollocksed up something big. Something the evil bastards really wanted to go a different way. That means we're on to something--and instead of getting our backs, you're saying "oh, let them go"?

This isn't a "personality dispute" or a witch hunt. This is catching the bitches red handed in one of their ops--and taking flack for it. And where are you mate? It's easy to go after eejits like Wieck who come trolling by online. Not so easy to crack a national team of suspected psy-operatons, who're feeling so threatened, they're bringing out every cliched trick in the cointepro book.

And you think stopping is going to help?!?!? Oi! That's what they want! That's the point of all the videos, and personal info speculation, and blog cooridination, and emailings and shite--the point is to shut us up.

Well,. fuck no, mate! Like I told Nico, I'm not stopping until I have the "man behind the curtain".

Now, if you think being a quiet wee mouse is the best way to deal with murdering bastards who've probably set their agents to track us down, guess we'll just have to respectfully disagree. Notice how we're not attacking you for not joining us. So kindly back off, chum.

Lead, follow, or get the bloody hell out of the way.

______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Submitted by Col. Jenny Sparks on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 9:21pm.

» login to post comments | -4 points

Ok, here's a lead. Or are you gonna get in my way? : )

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Please, do not put words in my mouth.

I've never once said anything even closely approximating 'let it go'. If you need to 'hang on to it', that's a decision only you can make.

What I HAVE tried to say, and will try again, is to first express what I think about the dynamic I see you in. And second, advise toward a new course that YOU determine, based on what I offer if you'll permit me to be so bold.

If you're on to something... and you may very well be, I can not know. I can not possibly know each and every detail you've immersed yourself in, besides, it's not my style... yet I trust you do as you see fit. If you're onto something, that's great, but from what I've heard 'on the street' around here is that you have garnered an unsavory, and disADVANTAGEous "appearance". Appearance ADVANTAGE, mind you. You, me, many of our dear friends can have all the casual disregard for appearances we like or not... yet THIS appearance is undermining your advantage with extreme probability. And MY advantage for that matter, that is, if you want me to make this personal.

That's my opinion. Utterly meaningless. As it should be.

Yet now allow me to justify such an opinion:

If in fact you are on to something, someone, group, a cointel agitatprop mk-mockingbird psyop, what have you... and you suspect you're dealing with some ultra high-end skill sets pitted against you (us)... highly coordinated, well funded, with the intent of directly or cumulatively undermining the 'movement' seeking truth and justice... a section subset of the original and ongoing 9/11 op itself.. or a grander overarching op of which 9/11 was itself a subset...

... then trust that by now "They" have ALREADY got every darn detail, foible, habit, hangout and drink preference you've ever had, and move you make all day long. They're THAT good! Take MY word for it if you will, if that means anything to you what-so-ever.

Do you agree with that, or not?

Then the pretense above, that divulging or posting such information about one of us on the internet as a threat... is thus, hollow. "They", are NOT going to leave even a wishful physical hit to be left to vigilante jengo-patriots. They'll "DO IT" in person. BUT, character and/or comfort "assignation", or FEAR for one's safety, is vastly superior in this case. In such a case, your REAL identity, character and whereabouts known actually to several or many, is your ONLY genuine security. The downside of screen name avatars in an information war against REAL people.

For example: I'll give you real details about me, in return for yours. I trust you, but even if YOU are not actually trustworthy... I'm not afraid of you. What do you think of that? Hell, you could even dare me to post mine first... and then you decide if you want to demonstrate real trustworthiness by returning the gesture. THAT, is how serious this life and death 'game' is!

Also, "They" will NOT actually BE racists in the way general populous think of it. So again, hollow.

If the idea that 9/11 researchers could somehow, are, or will be conflated with racists, antisemites, Ameri-Quada-freedom-haters... is then a hollow cavern with no echo UNLESS you return it... with ANYTHING.

The only people being made to LOOK bad, are the ones casting any such dispersion BACK. Check yourself, Jenny... you're not actually a racist are you? At least I highly doubt you are. But is someone close to you pushing an idea that you could be cast as one should you fail at repelling the conflation of 9/11 study with something like say, racism? The bastard who's doing this, pulled this off and has you thinking you're chasing someone out in front of you, when if They exist at all, they're in fact standing behind you. Boo! That's why they're called spooks.

I want you to understand this with me, should I say more here and now? Or do you want me to drop this so that you can check your books and logs. I mean this in the most friendly and generous way. Let me know what you think, publicly if at all possible. If YOU are actually The Enemy, you'd be a most foolish one posting here, and now.

This is actually NOT about "dropping it". It's about "pulling their plug" all together. You are the wire.

Continuing, if you're still reading, is an answer to a question that is reasonable to expect if in fact you agree with the above but might still be wonder about "What they'll do next?" Or where will they go? Or Will they get away with it, yet so close within grasp but for only you stopped chasing?

Many will get away. Many will try this elsewhere. Many will try something new. Many always will.... FOREVER.

Turn the act, back upon them... in a manner of art. Detective work, which I think you should be done with by now, can only be used so far. It IS time for something NEW. That is... if you're actually ready.

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Sat, 10/06/2007 - 12:39am.

» login to post comments | 4 points

I'm not too chuffed with you right now, but cheers for...

...putting some thought into your response.

Now here's another lead---you don't think I'm telling you everything we're planning/doing on a public forum, do yeh?

Give us some credit mate-- there is a reason the bastards are getting nasty. You're only a seeing a fraction of the action. So leave us to it, eh?
______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Submitted by Col. Jenny Sparks on Sat, 10/06/2007 - 1:51am.

» login to post comments | -3 points

Fine, sounds like you've got plenty of confidence.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Sat, 10/06/2007 - 2:23am.

» login to post comments | 2 points

If you've got questions, you could have given us an email

You had some good points, but I'm not hashing out strategy where God and everyone can see.

Sorry--but cheers for the luck.
______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Submitted by Col. Jenny Sparks on Sat, 10/06/2007 - 10:54pm.

» login to post comments | -1 points

Jenny, im not accusing you

Jenny, im not accusing you of anything but ive heard that you are manipulating point totals here on blogger. is that true?

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Submitted by Chris on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 9:18am.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Sound like Fox News Speak,

Sound like Fox News Speak, the ominous "People have said..."
--
Truth Revolution: The Eleventh of Every Month

Submitted by imgstacke on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 1:15pm.

» login to post comments | -1 points

i see you've seen Gleen

i see you've seen Gleen Greenwalds film as well. good for you. i dont want to put anybody out there without permission, thats why i leave their names out. this isnt a television broadcast, but please, continue to compare me asking a question on a message board to Fox News. thats not pathetic or anything.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Submitted by Chris on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 1:21pm.

» login to post comments | 0 points

Do what?!?

Not anymore than anyone else does by simply voting on blogs and comments.

What you're implying--manipulation of voting above and beyond what we all do--is only in the power of the moderators.

Now you owe an explaination why you're even throwing that flame bait out, mate. Email me privately if you prefer.

FYI--my moniker aside, I'm not really 107 years old and capable of manipulating electricity.*roll eyes*

But I am voting down your question on the basic principle, that, as written, it's idiotic. Is that the "manipulation" you're refering to? Cause we all do that...
______________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Recent Headlines

Recent Media

Action Items

Blogads

Banner Exchange

User login

9/11 Inquiry Sites

9/11 Regional Sites

9/11 Related Sites

9/11 International Sites

9/11 Memorial Sites

News and Blogs

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

"Amerika Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation