[Awesome] Military photos of the Twin Towers
DocRock Mon, 09/24/2007 - 8:22pm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/282415/Awesome-Military-photos-of-the-Twin-Towers
There are some new pictures that have surfaced of the twin towers and related destruction.
Some good shots of building 7 and aerial views of the collapses.
- DocRock's blog
- Login to post comments
Stunning and Painful Material
These photos bring back painful memories. Especially those of the jumpers and the people trapped in the burning upper floors.
Just look at those steel bars hurtling laterally as the building explodes.
Jetfuel? The damage and structural failure due to the impact?
Concrete into dust? From jetfuel fire? That is some kerosene.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel
Where did this TREMENDOUS EXPLOSIVE ENERGY COME FROM ENOUGH TO HURL STEEL BEAMS with such fury?
We MUST NEVER FORGET. And We MUST NEVER STOP.
It hurts deep inside just thinking of the jumpers.
They were pawns in a deadly global game.
The Grand Chessboard.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard
And so are we.
It is time for checkmate.
Constitutionally.
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.truthaction.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it.
These are REALLY good!
These are REALLY good! Some thoughts:
I've always wondered if the "jumpers" were jostled by explosions while leaning out the windows for air.
I don't see any "scooped out" section of WTC7 (per the OCT apologists), just debris impaled in its side causing superficial damage. Also, it doesn't seem likely that the lower level fires were caused by that debris. Wouldn't the corner section show some signs of fire immediately?
Great views of severely damaged, Godzilla-stomped buildings which forgot to turn to dust in solidarity with WTC7.
Look at pic 43 and 49 - Proof of NIST fraud?
That damage looks a lot like the damage that supposedly building 7 in the infamous NIST photo. Is this proof that the NIST building 7 photo is positively not building 7?
Seems to me they used a photo from another building and attributed it to 7. I have heard this mentioned before, but not in the context of having an actual photo that proves it - if indeed this does.
opinions wanted.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB
Good observation. What
Good observation. What building is that in pictures 43 and 49?
________________
JFK on secrecy and the press
World Financial Center
That's the World Financial Center which is west of the trade center.
http://westchester911truth.org
"A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right." Thomas Paine
Ok, so
if we know for a fact that photos 43 and 49 are NOT wtc7 then we need someone with the expertise to analyse these images and compare them against the NIST 7 photo, and see if infact it can be proven that the NIST photo is NOT wtc7.
Anyone know anyone that can do this analysis?
I think this could be ANOTHER huge blow to the official bs.
EDIT: I pulled down the image set as a pdf and have extracted the 2 images as adobe psd files. I can convert them to any format or leave them as psd's for anyone who wants to do an image comparison. Maybe ill post a blog entry and post the images up to this site.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB
There are several photos of
There are several photos of WTC 7 damage here or here. Does not look the same to me, but someone with more training might see something in the comparison.
________________
JFK on secrecy and the press
Still no pic...
... of the south side of WTC7.
more pics
http://911blogger.com/node/7197
Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.