I was thinking the same thing, but the information about the electromagnetic disturbance in the area is interesting nonetheless. We have two Air Force vets saying two different things, I wonder if there is a tie breaker out there to verify either statement.
--
The 9/11 Truth B-Team

Debris was not scattered over 8 sq. miles. There were initial reports that debris was found in Indian Lake, which people mistakenly thought was 8 miles away (because they used map programs which measure the route by car, not as the crow flies). Then some troll or sloppy researcher turned this into 8 SQUARE miles, which turned into the typical talking point of people like Fetzer (when they aren't arguing that there was no plane at all).

In fact, some debris scatter was detected in points up to 4 miles away, which suffices in strongly suggesting a mid-air break-up and hence a missile. An engine was 800-1000 yards away, it may have however rolled down a hill.

The smoking gun is the way the govt doesn't bother to explain this stuff, just sweeps it away. I think the strongest evidence suggesting a shootdown is the government 9/11 commission's deliberate changing of the crash time from 10:06 (according to a) all initial reports and b) the seismic report!) to 10:03, and the claim that the end of the cockpit voice recorder was cut off (by 1-4 minutes). What the hell would this be disguising? A failure of the passenger uprising? Or its success?

The electric disruption sounds like a possibility, but as you say - what explains mid-air breakup?

---
"Truth is not measured in mass appeal."
summeroftruth.org

with a fully intact 757 impacting the ground.

The finely scattered debris field does seem to indicate one or more bombs on the plane.

---

Link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guEqg1SdMpE

---

Link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSZG3a8F-YM

---

Weighing up the data and using my instincts seem to indicate that a missile had been fired to create the Shanksville crater and / or the subsequent grey mushroom cloud, but then the crater may have been caused by the engine falling to earth from a high altitude (making the cloud and crater separate events).

The debris is very important piece of the puzzle and until a real and full inquiry occurs, "Flight 93" will always be an enigma, requiring speculation.

I would never rule out an "operation northwoods" type scenario... Below are some "Northwood" quotes which I believe are relevant

---

(11) Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be lieu of (10)).

b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.

---

8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio

---

Lots of "Northwoods" links at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

The safest thing regarding "Flight 93" is to not rule anything out until a full investigation is allowed.

Best wishes