Recent Headlines
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
First Eleventh of the Month Action in Wales
Pipeline-Istan by Pepe Escobar
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Richard Gage Interviews Architects at AIA Convention, April 30, 2009
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
New Version of "Loose Change" on the Way
Pre-9/11 GPS "Aerial Navigation Corridors"
Fujita Gets Great Japanese Support
On the Torture Memos
No CIA/FBI "Wall"
Project Censored: Deconstructing Deceit
Turner Construction and NAVSEA
Lee Hamilton's Loose Grip on Moussaoui
Staged Terrorism Exposed in German Press
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Recent Media
Richard Gage AIA on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
AE911Truth “Companion” Edition 10-Minute WTC 7 Video Online
AUDIO: Visibility 9-11 Welcomes John-Michael Talboo and Stewart Bradley of Debunking the Debunkers
VIDEO: Dutch TV Show Finds Osama Not Guilty of 9/11
VIDEO: Luke Rudkowski on Russia Today
VIDEO: Truth Action Ottawa 9/11 Truth At Willie Nelson Concert
AUDIO: Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Kevin Ryan and Dr. Steven E. Jones
AUDIO: Kevin Ryan on KPFK - 4.6.2009
VIDEO: Colbert tears into Glenn Beck's "9/12" Project
VIDEO: George Galloway on CBC's "The Hour"
VIDEO: Three Weeks In September A 9/11 First Responder Documentary Summer 2009
VIDEO: Would You Accept This?
VIDEO: The Art of Tabling
Action Items
Help Force Congress To Observe the Law on National Emergencies!
Ask A Lawyer to Join Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
New ACTIVATE Action Alert Tool at Visibility911.com
The Eleventh Day of Every Month
Support 9/11 First Responders
9/11 Email
Pledge: No False Flags or Martial Law
Blogads
Blogads
Asbestos Dangers

Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.
FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.
Get the news, get the facts.
Banner Exchange
User login
9/11 Regional Sites
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
911review.com
911proof.com
911Truth.org
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
911revisited.com
william911.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
timetowakeup.net
911tv.org
grandtheftcountry.com
Youth for 9/11 Truth
truth911.net
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
explosive911analysis.com
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
supportthetruth.com
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
nw0.info
investigate911.com
theultimateconspiracy.com
9/11 International Sites
torontochange.com
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
reopen911.info
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
Bush tries to grant himself and entire administration immunity for war crimes dating back to 9/11/01
This is where your focus should be:
Does anyone know if this passed?
I'd bet money it did.......not that the pussies in this Congress would go after him anyway.......
We need to hope some other country does, though!
Senate Bill Number?
This should be sent far and wide. Our senators should be notified that this is totally unacceptable, especially after the failure of the Habeas Corpus legislation today. First we need a Senate Bill number- does anyone have this information? This is no time to sit idle.
Please forgive my ignorance
Is that story today???
It sounds like it was from last year
If you listen to Jack Cafferty it sounds like this story was from last fall before the Nov. 2006 election. He says "if the Democrats gain control of the House".
It doesn't really matter in the long run
The Supreme Court will just strike it down as unconstitutional.
Ideally.
At least there are a few MSM reporters who are doing a halfway decent job.
----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein
The Critical Mass.
The Critical Mass is the only solution. The only answer. And the only hope. The media hasn't done their job. The Congressmen haven't done theirs. The Supreme Court. Well we'll see. The Critical Mass can clean this mess up. The Media will have to bow to them. The Congress will have to follow them. We have to continually and creatively spread the materials. Understand and affect the Consciousness of the Nation. Figure out where the envelope is and push it. The materials, technology, and opportunities are out there. Bottom Line.
yes it would be good to know
yes it would be good to know the date of this show and the HR number.
My questions:
* By doing this, are they not tacitly admitting that they have committed war crimes?
* Is there and should there be such a thing as "immunity" to prosecution for war crimes?
Rumsfeld, immunity, and Military Commissions Act of 2006
My searches found several hits from May-June 2004 and this good article from Nov 2006 at Democracy Now:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/09/1444246
Specifically, see the "Military Commissions Act" reference about granted? immunity in Michael Ratner's 2nd answer block. There was another good article from Dec 2006 at:
http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=10136
This could make it appear that Impeachment before 2008 is the only answer for Bush/Cheney/Rice's war crimes (and obstruction of justice/evidence tampering in the 9/11 WTC investigations), but the "recently retired" like Rumsfeld/Rove/Gonzales/Powell &Giuliani? might be open to prosecution from my brief review. Getting a class action lawsuit filed against Bush/Cheney/Rice would be a good step to prevent our 2008 President from granting a "sprinkling powers" full pardon, ala Gerald Ford/Nixon, in January 2009.
don't see when this was yet . . .
This was posted on You Tube 4 days ago. But I see no mention of it on Cafferty File.
This is merely
This is merely psychological. For those who still consent to being governed by the constitution I recommend you actually read it. For the bulk of you who continue to be too lazy to read the document you want upheld I will cite for you the pertinent clause: Article I Section 10 - No State shall ...pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or ..." That's all the spoon feeding I'm going to do. Now go look up ex post facto Law like a good Citizen. For the average dumbed down person living in the territory called the US, they have no clue that what they discuss on CNN is banned in the Constitution. This is why CNN presented it and made it sound like it could work. Do you recall the OJ Simpson trial? CNN has it's own lawyers and they obviously could have requested their opinion on this matter but they didn't because they are in the business of PSYCHOLOGICALLY CONDITIONING the population. When you watch the news you need to go read up on what they talk about to see if it's legit.
And for crying out loud, if you want to be ruled by the Constitution go read the damn thing!
"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)
OIL IS OBSOLETE - WAKE UP - YOU'VE BEEN LIED TO, AGAIN!
http://www.waterfuelcell.org/
FOUND IT
Published on Saturday, September 23, 2006 by the Chicago Sun-Times
Bush Seeks Immunity for Violating War Crimes Act
by Elizabeth Holtzman
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0923-22.htm
Here's the guy who posted it on YouTube 4 days ago . . .
http://www.youtube.com/user/quq5
This should be edited to have a note by the moderators so people don't send this out mistakenly, as I did. I flagged it on YouTube --- 400+ views in 4 days but no one says when it is from, only that they've never heard about it. Probably in the middle of a Britney or OJ or Miner-disaster issue.
But the importance of the UN is right here. Imagine if there were no UN . . . which is what Ron Paul wants.
US drops war crimes exemption plea
Associated Press
Thursday June 24, 2004
The Guardian
The United States was yesterday forced to drop a UN resolution giving American peacekeeping troops renewed immunity from prosecution for war crimes, after facing determined opposition in the security council.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1246107,00.html
Constitution clarification on Article 1 Section 9
Hello Whitey,
Very good post- I noticed that Article 1, Section 10 involves States' powers and restrictions per se, where Article 1, Section 9 immediately preceding states among other things:
"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. [there was no rebellion or invasion on 9/11/2001]
No Bill of Attainder or EX POST FACTO Law shall be passed. [uppercase added for emphasis]
No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.
...
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time. [really needs some investigation in light of "secret" 1947 National Security Act NSA/CIA/DoD/DoJ budgets, Afghanistan/Iraq Occupational Wars, and Homeland Security budgets, including "white, black, & gray" front corporations, "black" secretive budgets, and official "white" GAO budgets]
The early Bill of Rights states:
"The conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent MISCONSTRUCTION or ABUSE of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added. [uppercase added for emphasis]
...
Article the eleventh [Amendment IX "Ninth"]
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Article the twelfth [Amendment X "Tenth"]
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, OR TO THE PEOPLE." ***[uppercase added, since this is KEY to the legality of the illegitimate 1947 National Security Act, Executive Orders, Signing Statements, and Presidential Security Directives]***
This is an EXCELLENT set of references for ALL U.S. Citizens to bookmark:
http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm
http://www.constitution.org/indexco_.htm [index]
http://www.constitution.org/cs_found.htm [Founding Documents]
Also, while I'm politically independent and not really affiliated with the Populist Party (or any other party for that matter), my search found 4 prophetic articles from 2006 on repairing the "Bush/Cheney Trainwreck" at:
http://www.populistamerica.com/bush_cheney_trainwreck___undo
http://www.populistamerica.com/bush_cheney_trainwreck___undo___part_ii
http://www.populistamerica.com/bush_cheney_trainwreck___undo___part_iii
http://www.populistamerica.com/bush_cheney_trainwreck___undo___part_iv
P.S. I can't seem to edit my earlier post above- any legal action taken against the PNAC Bushites still holding public office would likely need to include a court injunction to stop any pardons or "legistative" loophole snafus.
It's still there
The early Bill of Rights states:
"The conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent MISCONSTRUCTION or ABUSE of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added. [uppercase added for emphasis]
That is still the Preamble to the Bill of Rights. Just ask yourself why it is rarely ever included when the BOR is reprinted.
Most sheeples believe that CONgress, in their beneficent wisdom, has granted them their Rights.
Thanks for the recomendations for Constitutional study. I had just visited Roland's site a few days ago. This is an excellent primer for anyone:
Summary of Constitutional Rights, Powers and Duties
http://www.constitution.org/powright.htm
"Discussions of rights are sometimes confused concerning what are and are not rights of the people or powers of government or the duties of each. This is an attempt to summarize the rights, powers, and duties recognized or established in the U.S. Constitution, in Common Law as it existed at the time the U.S. Constitution was adopted, or as implied therein. Not included are certain "internal" rights and powers that pertain to the various elements of government within each level with respect to each other."
For a number of eye-opening treatises, go here:
Click on the Education link. Dave Champion, a gentleman who appeared briefly in America: Freedom to Fascism, has written these excellent articles.
--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)
This is From Nearly ONE YEAR AGO!!!
The Bill was H.R.6054. The CNN show date was around Sept. 28th, 2006. So, while I don't specifically remember this one, does anyone know if this bill passed?
BTW, 911Blogger ought to get this off their front page. WE SHOULDN'T BE LOOKING AT IT! The video, as someone already allude to, was from last year!!!
OFF THE FRONT PAGE PLEASE!
Ken
This is not
This is not NEW
/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info
This Bill was passed
of course. It became S.3930 and signed into law 10/16/06'.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN03930:@@@L&summ2=m&








NO!!!
Is my answer to the immunity question