.......so true.

and they are 90% on the side of people questioning 911 and wanting a new investigation. Here is the link to the story. At the bottom is a link to the comments with the number of them highlighted in blue.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Bill_Maher_Thinks_911_Truthers_should_0915...

This has been going on for two days and is still going strong.

On the shoulders of the families of the 911 Victims who didn't accept the hush money. It still might not be too late to make a case in court. LAWSUITS and ATTORNEYS are what is needed to take the 911 Consciousness Movement to the next level. We don't need to rue over Bill Maher. It's not his responsibility to get the Truth out. ~He is entitled to his skepticism.~ Many of us were also skeptical of 911 Truth at one time. On the other hand the families of the Victims *owe* it to the Victims themselves to pursue this legally to force the Truth out in the discovery process only court and subpoenas can lend. Class Action lawsuits from Victims Families may be the only way the Victims can strike back at those who harmed them. The Families are their representatives.

"How big a lunatic do you have to be to watch two giant airliners packed with jet fuel slam into buildings on live TV, igniting a massive inferno that burned for two hours, and then think 'Well, if you believe that was the cause...'
Stop asking me to raise this ridiculous topic on the show and start asking your doctor if Paxil is right for you." -- Bill Maher, 09-14-07

The question is, how big a lunatic do YOU have to be, Mr. Maher, to swallow the official theory with so many discrepancies, hook, line and sinker? Maybe you should use some of that Paxil yourself, calm down, and invite some real experts to your show to create a meaningful debate?

Imagine that -- as if there was nothing to investigate -- the planes hit the buildings, the buildings were on fire, the buildings came down -- case closed! The use of adjectives also helps: "giant airlines" (not really, just 767s), "massive infernos" (nope, not that massive at all, compared to many other fires in other high-rises that did not collapse). Apparently, the "hollow steel shaft" was not even necessary in light of the previous two strong arguments! How pathetic! It is mindboggling to hear something so dumb from otherwise witty Bill Maher!

I still don't get it -- why be proactive about it? If he doesn't want to deal with 9-11, couldn't he just be quiet on the topic? Is he so much scared of strike two in his career that he needs to actually take proactive role in the government cover story on the biggest issue of our society right now? Is his show doing so bad that he needs to take the Dennis Miller route -- selling out to political interests?

It sure is curious. But I don't believe for a second that he would not see the 9-11 white elephant in the livingroom. I don't think he is naive. Paid off or scared is more likely...

and get on the show as a large group and give him something to talk about. We can also protest in front of CBS television city at Fairfax and Beverly blvds. on Friday afternoon as audience files into the auditorium.

In fact, I would call that one if his greatest and worst faults.

He never grew up, so he acts like a little boy. And when adults act like children, "bad things" are the inevitable result.

Bill Maher should be the poster boy for that.

----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

http://www.chico911truth.org/

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein