Orwell's Triumph - There is no van full of explosives reported at the George Washington Bridge.

There was never a van full of explosives reported at the George Washington Bridge.

A van full of explosives at the George Washington Bridge did not exist.

Crimes of the State Blog

The raison d'etre for the 9/11 Truth Movement in one easy step.

Dan Rather CBS News on September 11th 2001

Jerusalem Post,

September 12, 2001 (mirrored):

(08:45) Car bomb found on George Washington Bridge

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge connecting New York and New Jersey.

The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge.

Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported.

You will not find one word about this incident in the 9/11 Commission Report, nor in the Congressional Joint Inqury.

Checkmate.

They have deliberately ignored perhaps the greatest smoking gun of September 11th. Perpetrators in custody by FBI. Explosives seized in the act of targeting one of New York's largest bridges ON SEPTEMBER 11TH 2001.

Then nothing. Complete and deafening silence. It disappeared from history.

Here is the transcript of Dan Rather's CBS report (on live TV to millions of viewers):

"Two suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives were discovered around the George Washington Bridge. That bridge links New York to New Jersey over the Hudson River. Whether the discovery of those explosives had anything to do with other events today is unclear, but the FBI, has two suspects in hand, said the truckload of explosives, enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge..."

Now, on what planet can this report just be ignored by a congressional investigation of 9/11, without any attempt to explain it whatsoever?

And all you smug blinders-on "debunkers" out there, who's "nuts?" Who's "irrational?" Who's not looking at "the facts?" (Go send some more money to BushCo.)

George Orwell (pseudonym of Eric Arthur Blair) remains our age's greatest thinker, which is a real shame since he died back in 1950.

I try to look at the bright side of 1984, that these concepts are exposed, and obvious to a great many, where once they were hidden and mysterious. "He who controls the present controls the past."

There is so much evidence that our past has been altered -- by tossing the disagreeable parts into the Memory Hole -- that it would take a highly ignorant person, an intentionally ignorant person, to not see it. At some point, in a nominal "democracy", ignorance should rise to the level of criminal. At least such ignorance should be called out, shunned, exposed for the intellectual cowardice and sloth it truly is.

Agents from the state of Israel were driving that van full of explosives. That's why you haven't heard about it again. That's why it can't be mentioned in congressional "investigations." That's why the 9/11 Truth Movement is attacked across even the "alternative" media. It's not the disinformation "whack job" theories, although those tie in. It's the Israeli connection to the attacks which makes it forbidden to talk about on both "alternative" and on corporate controlled airwaves.

Fox News Sets the Example

Before the excessive clampdown on information, Carl Cameron produced an eye opening 4 part series on extensive Israeli spying in America, including Israeli government infiltration of our nation's telephone billing records, and even of the secure US government telephone systems.

It is from Cameron's investigation that we learned from a US government source: "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

Cameron report currently mirrored on Youtube.

Stroke of a pen, poof. Like the George Washington Bridge van full of explosives, Carl Cameron's 4 part broadcast, which went out to millions of viewers, disappeared without a trace from the Fox "News" website. Down the Memory Hole it went. It was also removed from the web archive The Wayback Machine. Someone really wanted this information buried.

The Fox report attempts to frame the issue as one of Israeli foreknowledge of 9/11, without the possibility of active participation in the attacks. This innocence is clearly not proven and is simply editorializing. Given the scale and severity of the cover up, we cannot assume that this massive espionage operation was as benign as is claimed.

For my money, the deepest, darkest secrets of 9/11 are to be found at Mossad front operation Urban Moving Systems, in Weehawken NJ, and the "real" investigation should begin right there.

Perhaps a few questions for Urban Moving’s owner, Dominik Otto Suter, who fled to Israel shortly before he was to be re-questioned by the FBI?

Or asking Paul Kurzberg why he felt the need to celebrate so overtly when Flight 11 plowed into the North Tower that witnesses called the police on him and his team?

I'm quite tired of living in Oceania, with the unquestioning Proles. Somewhere in the FBI is a Winston Smith who knows more than he was supposed to know about these matters. We can hope, right?

###

I'm sick of people playing ignorant.

This and Sibel Edmonds case seems pretty big. Great find. Great effing post man. This shit is making me sick and is exactly why the hell I am spending my time on sites like this to expose this effing bullcrap. Why the hell are we surrounded by so many ignorant and lazy people. Geez. As you grow up, or in my case, I've realized that people aren't what you think they are. It's amazing how foolish and simple most people are and can be tricked. And then to think how we can be fooled in plain site like that. I mean they pulled it off right in front of us. Damn. WTF is going on seems to be my only response. I live in the twilight zone here.

Great pic of the man too. I hadn't seen him before. :)

you are not alone.

Most people I know prefer to remain ignorant, the knowledge is disturbing and they just want a nice simple happy life and besides they think that they can not make one iota of difference. That bugs me but they are just doing what they can to get by in this life and aren't really harming anyone too much (if you set aside their misplaced values e.g. consumerism, etc.).

What really bugs me are those who play ignorant and vehemently argue with 'doublethink' logic that the OCT is the only thing that makes sense. In a word, freakin proles. When I read 1984 some 25 or 30 years ago it was bizarre science fiction, something I could not imagine ever being real.

Yet here we are and there are proles everywhere; scared to consider anything but what the T.V. tells them to think.

Hope comes from recognizing how many people do see through the lies and are actively trying to expose the truth.

Excellent post.

Thanks.

Yeah. good perspective Romill. That first paragraph really hit me. Sometimes I forget that not everybody cares as much as I do about the state of us as a whole or group. And there's nothing wrong with that. So long, like you say, that they basically aren't harming anyone. I should make sure to keep my vengeance aimed at those who are willingly confronting and trying to thwart those that are seeking the truth, like Popular Mechanics, Bush Zombies, and the general Mainsteam Media, etc.

Scare tactics and

Scare tactics and manipulating history baby!! Works every goddamn time. It really never fails and they know it. People need to...seriously wake the F'up! The sad part is, money talks and the media is getting a lot of green paper.

"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--for ever." - George Orwell

A good example of

how the media are not always running on some kind of script.

I think when Barrett and Zwicker and others talk about the media on 9/11 coordinating their coverage according to a Hollywood script (Zwicker's phrase) they are promoting a false impression of the actual complexity of media coordination. The story of the van of explosives on the George Washington Bridge was initially covered by the media. That's significant. It's also significant that it was dropped soon thereafter and never mentioned again. At the very least, the story shows how, yes, the media are mostly organs of repression working on behalf of the deep state, but also that the media are not 100% controlled and directed by some man behind the curtain. The story did, after all, appear.

Similarly, the media did talk about explosions in the towers on 9/11. They interviewed people who heard explosions. Reporters themselves talked about explosions. It was only later, after the framing of 9/11 was implicitly accepted by corporate media outlets, that we never again heard of explosions in the towers.

Paul Thompson's approach to 9/11 reflects what I am saying. Thompson often says that it is NOT the case that the media neglected to cover 9/11; rather, the media simply did not connect many dots regarding 9/11. Many mainstream stories at cooperativeresearch.org contain valuable clues, but the clues are rarely pieced together in a narrative that exposes or opposes deep state politics.

The media more or less

The media more or less report the events of the day, but with big events like 9/11, they very quickly come to accept a basic story line and from then on pretty much stick to it, misreporting or failing to report any evidence or opinion that contradicts it. This happens because the media are controlled but also because most people, including journalists, are discomfited by new facts that require them to rethink their political opinions, which for most are just a couple of slogans pasted over the surface of deep, primitive emotions. We are seeing a few good signs in the mainstream and we can expect more. The great beast that is American public/media opinion is starting to roll over. It will take time for this grotesque animal to accomplish its task, but it will happen, and then all the media bugs and flies will climb over onto its other side and start sucking blood there.
________________

JFK on secrecy and the press

So who were these 'two

So who were these 'two suspects' and what did the FBI do with them?
--
The 9/11 Truth B-Team

The proles have the power

The proles have the power to bring the truth to the new media -- Digg etc. Two hundred people using Digg as their main news channel would dramatically shift the balance.

To use Digg as your main news channel link to a reasonable selection of friends and use the Friends Activity > Dugg in Upcoming function.

One that nearly made front page:
http://digg.com/political_opinion/A_Free_Press_or_a_Ministry_of_Truth_3

And one that made front page:
http://digg.com/tech_news/Are_Intelligence_Agencies_Secretly_Censoring_W...

Yes, Dan really went off the

Yes, Dan really went off the reservation with that report.

Read the original Bergen Record article on the Mossad team.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/record_9-11.jpg

They were reported celebrating "after initial impact and subsequent explosion". They were ready with a front row seat in Liberty State Park, cameras trained on the towers.

And btw, their explanation that they were in the UMS office, saw the coverage on the internet and went outside for a better look is an insult to your intelligence. Google map UMS in Weehawken and Liberty State Park. It's a nice little drive.

More from the pattern recognition dept:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,52681,00.html

http://www.kingsbayperiscope.com/stories/052704/kin_truck001.shtml

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

The 4part FOX news story.

Played only once. VERY interesting.

http://ia341213.us.archive.org/3/items/FoxIsraeliSpyRing/

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.