Very superficial treatment in this video, and short shrift given truth-seeking by individuals and groups. No mention of the scientists, structural engineers and pilots who refute beyong a doubt the physics of the official story. Last word on each topic was always provided, inadequately, by PM fluffer Meigs or Lee ~"we studied in depth whether dynamite could have been used" Hamilton. CBC would do well to update their 2006 effort by including Griffin's recent devastating criticisms of NIST's "answers" to the important questions, still unanswered, which the CBC commentator alluded were comprehensively addressed on the NIST website. What about mentioning Scholars, Engineers, Patriots, or Pilots sites that present entirely more realistic answers?

Still, many kudos to the CBC for letting a small shaft of light fall on this darkened subject.

C'mon, people: The CBC personnel are screaming out in support of us. They have included links on their website to the websites of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Journal of 9/11 Studies, and Jim Hoffman's website, wtc7.net. They even link to Loose Change. I'd say that's better treatment than we have received from almost any mainstream media outlet.