I clicked on the link and there is a whole blog there.
Sure we have been having warnings for a while but where is the article this was supposedly copied from?

Sorry. See this note:
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/08/next-911-predictions-propaganda...

It's an EXACT copy of a 2005 article--word for word.

At your link - which is a list of warnings - you have a copy of the Kennebunkport Warning with a date of Aug 2007 and a reference number of 38.
The first two words in it are Massive Evidence. This pair of words does not appear anywhere else on the page. Word for Word?
Or does one of us need to wipe off his reading glasses.
What is the reference number of the 2005 article?

Like most people I thought at first that the Kennebunkport Warning was legitimate. I thought the warning was real, and that the signatures were legitimate. After reading this warning and noticing that it had claimed "massive evidence" without supplying any, I provided a link to my own research that I have been doing for more than a month.

While I strongly agree that there is a serious risk of an attack on Iran (and by extension a "trigger" to justify it), I strongly disagree with the unethical use of signatures to support such a warning. I do not know when or if the next false flag will occur, but I do know that there is very strong evidence that the Bush administration intends to go to war with Iran. Many others have warned about this, which you can clearly see if you take the time to read my research.

The question then becomes, if the Kennebunkport Warning is a hoax, what is its purpose? Is its purpose to discredit future warnings, or even the Kennebunkport Warning itself? Is its purpose to discredit anti-war activists by associating them with Jim Fetzer, space beams, and TV fakery? Is its purpose to create division between 9/11 truth activists and the anti-war movement? Is there a deliberate attempt to discredit suspicions about the Bush regime orchestrating another false flag? Is this part of a psychological operation to seed the idea that any new warnings are also hoaxes, thus crippling our ability to warn about the next false flag attack?

I don't know the answer to these questions, but they are all worth asking.

As for the 90 days warning, it is a fake warning. If you do not believe me, do a google search for this warning and you will find it is an exact duplicate of an article printed and published in 2005. In fact the "2007" warning has no DATE on it--until you go to the printer version, revealing that it is 2005.

See:
Jon Gold, Is Fox News Recycling Terror To Scare The Masses? 911blogger, August 2, 2007:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10380

Obviously, I know now that the Kennebunkport warning is most likely a hoax, and I will have to update my post with the warnings to include it under the heading "Fake Warnings"--right beside the 90 days fake warning.

I never said the Kennebunkport warning was a "word for word" copy of a 2005 article... you have obviously misread what I said. I said the 90 days warning was a word for word copy.

I think you should read what some of the other posters have said about this issue:
UPDATE: The Signed Kennebunkport Warning
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10947

"I signed a statement in Kennebunkport to endorse the impeachment of Dick Cheney, but my signature has been used on this "Warning" without my consent. While I was humbled to have my signature misappropriated with such prominent voices as Cindy Sheehan, Cynthia McKinney, and Jamilla El-Shafei, none of us signed that document."

Is the The Signed Kennebunkport Warning A Hoax? Here is what we know:

Discussion on Truthaction.org
The Kennebunkport Warning: A Hoax?
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2123&start=15&postdays=0&po...

John Leonard says:
"As far as Dahlia Wasfi is concerned, I was a guest on Webster's radio show last night so I heard Bruce Marshall and Janice Weir say they saw her sign the statement."
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10925#comment-158932

It's fishy:
Dahlia S. Wasfi, MD: http://www.liberatethis.com/
"I signed a statement in Kennebunkport to endorse the impeachment of Dick Cheney, but my signature has been used on this "Warning" without my consent. While I was humbled to have my signature misappropriated with such prominent voices as Cindy Sheehan, Cynthia McKinney, and Jamilla El-Shafei, none of us signed that document."
Also: "I don't know about the validity of this "warning," but the people who put this list together were dishonest about signatories. They took our signatures for something else and put it on this. Very weird." http://www.911blogger.com/node/10925#comment-158583

Cindy Sheehan via MySpace: http://www.911blogger.com/node/10947#comment-158689
Further confirmation:
"the same thing happened to me as happened to dahlia" http://www.911blogger.com/node/10947#comment-158784

Others:
Each of us were approached during the rally at the Kennebunkport event on August 25, 2007, to sign a statement calling for the immediate impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney. Since then, the statement has been altered and posted on the internet, making it appear as if we have evidence that this administration will carry out a "false-flag terror operation."
None of us have such evidence, and therefore, none of us signed a statement stating that we do.
We wish the authors of the document well in continuing much needed investigations of all aspects of 9/11.

Signed:
Jamilla El-Shafei
Cindy Sheehan
Dahlia Wasfi
Ann Wright
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/26355

No, it's legitimate:
Kevin Barrett (according to Captain May see below)
Captain May http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/543
Webster Tarpley http://www.911blogger.com/node/10925

Craig Hill
"I just spoke with Craig Hill, treasurer of the Green Party of Vermont who verified that he is indeed a signatory of this document and indicated to me that the document is very real." http://www.911blogger.com/node/10925#comment-158645

Who made the Kennebunkport Warning?
Webster Tarpley http://www.911blogger.com/node/10925
The attached document file has at the end comments by Webster Tarpley

Wretched Individuals? Liars?? Tarpley Says about the controversy: http://www.911blogger.com/node/10947#comment-158784
"Some of the signers, under the obvious threats of totalitarian forces, are lying in appalling fashion about what they signed and if they signed. You can see for yourself from the facsimile who signed. We need to move beyond these wretched individuals.[sic]"

Tarpley then interviews Jim Fetzer: http://www.911blogger.com/node/10947#comment-158797
"Scholars stands with you. You may make Scholars for 9/11 Truth a signatory to your Kennebunkport Warning. [...] Keep up the great work! You are a clear, strong voice for truth! Jim (Fetzer)

Jim Fetzer, "Scholars endorse 'The Kennebunkport Warning': Report ominous signs of a privatized takeover of the nation"
http://www.inteldaily.com/?c=172&a=3378

Craig Hill, in response to questions about the Kennebunkport Warning:

I cannot understand the supposed shadiness of this rather innocuous statement. I say much worse every morning in the shower, and again once fully awakened on the telephone. I most certainly signed it, and would sign a much sterner version of its conclusions:

The traitors who killed Americans on 9/11 did so not only to promote endless war and destruction of our constitutional liberties, but to fulfill Adolf's dream of corporations uber alles (Hitler attacked Poland on 9/1; Daddy Bush's team accomplished what Hitler could not, an attack on America on 9/11).

It's all right there in PNAC, released in September 2000: The catastrophic catalyzing event, the overthrow of Saddam and reorganization of Iraq, the control of what was then $7 trillion of energy resources in the region, which means control of Iranian oil as well, the encirclement of Russia and China, and the reestablishment of SAC as the newest branch of our bloated military, Space Command, with the immediate aim of the militarization of space via nuclear weapons and other exotic dangers orbiting Earth, pointing down and controlling entire societies under threat they, too, may suffer that which Dr Judy Wood persuasively suggests occurred in NYC on 9/11: A demonstration showing the world's leaders what will happen to their cities unless they accede to the domination of Neocon Amerika.

Cindy signed the Kennebunkport Warning. Her signature is clear and crisp. I know the man who circulated it. He does not invent. She scanned it and signed on. I would like to know why the language in the document is seemingly "shady". She certainly didn't think so when she signed it. I feel this is something Cindy may have been advised to think long after the fact, or say she thought. What other agenda might her gatekeepers be promoting? Read it for yourself. Nothing shady was done to obtain her signature. "Please read this and, if you can, sign it." Her oblique criticism is what is unfortunately murky, i believe to her detriment, and hope she will reread what she signed and see it as the call that must be made at this time to arrest the slide toward another much worse and bigger war.
The onus is on her not to remove herself from these sentiments but to elaborate on them, repeatedly, to use her station and her race against Pelosi to stop the next bigger round of mass murder before it begins, not once it begins. That is the only agenda of the KW, though not the agenda of the single war party that controls its justifiably unpopular governance.

~ Craig Hill / Signator, Kennebunkport Warning

======

Thanks to WoZ:

From: The Real Cindy Sheehan
Date: Aug 29, 2007 8:03 PM

dear woz

(...)

whoever had me sign something the other day in
kennebunkport misrepresented it to me and my assistant.

i would never have signed that "warning" the way it was written.

thanks
cindy

The 9/11 truth movement is being attacked!! We are having a major COINTELPRO incident!!

False Flag 9/11 Activism! Sound the Alarm!

Judy Wood Space Beams? Jim Fetzer Interview and supporting press release? This is a SETUP

..."I am not the 911Blogger police". But you're making it very hard, "chum".

Now why don't you toddle off and read the responses to my email at TruthAction.org, starting here:
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5627#5627

There's a good lad.

Yet he feels confident enough in his estimation of Sheehan and the other alleged signatories' low moral character to call them "wretched individuals" and "appalling liars." Is this an example of his Civility in Discussion?

The Kennebunkport Warning: Hoax?

...after 3 damn hours on-line hunting for their email addresses--if I ever find the twat who did this they will be sorry... >:(

Subject: Another Tiresome inquiry about the "Kennebunkport Warning"--thank you all in advance!
To: "Cynthia McKinney" , "Cindy Sheehan" , "Craig Hill" , "Bruce Marshal" , Send an Instant Message jamillaelshafei@xxxx, tarpley@xxx, "Ann Wright" , "Dahlia Wasfi" , "George Martin" , Send an Instant Message "John Kaminsky"
CC: reprehensor.911blogger@xxxx, truthaction@xxxx

Hello all!

I'm a 9/11 internet activist who goes by the handle
"Jenny Sparks". I post at 911Blogger among other
places and I'm a bit of a loud mouth. ;-)

Thank you all for your activism and efforts,
particularly, Ms. Sheehan, and the Honorable Cynthia
McKinney.

Now I'm about to ask another tiresome question about
the "Kennebunkport Warning". Apologies in advance if
you are sick to the teeth about this issue. Here's a
link to a version of the suspected fraudulent
document:

http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/494
http://911blogger.com/node/10947

My question is: did any of you sign this document?

It seems too many people are spreading it around like
wildfire and this has the potential to split the
Anti-War activists communities and the 9/11 Activist
communities--possibly pitting them against each other.
Now we all know who would benefit from that...

So I'm making this foray to ask the "horse's mouths",
so to speak. Thank you in advance. Hopefully we will
all have more clairity about this issue soon.

Keep up the good work.

Cheers,

Jenny

PS: After three hours on-line hunting down all your
email addresses, I know I may have gotten some wrong,
or some may be old or unused. If you could all please
help this get to everyone who supposedly signed this
"Warning" so they can confirm or deny this, many
activists of all stripes will be grateful.

See them at:
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2123

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Want to throw up.

U.S. Terror Attack — 'Ninety Days at Most'
2005
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozi...

U.S. Terror Attack — 'Ninety Days at Most'
2007
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.moz...

"On the Fox Fan Central site itself the article is shown without any date!"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161962,00.html

You don't think I didn't notice that? Try clicking on the "printer friendly version" of that "2007" article.
http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,161962,00.html

Now read back to me what it says. I'm waiting.

As far as Dahlia Wasfi is concerned, I was a guest on Webster's radio show last night so I heard Bruce Marshall and Janice Weir say they saw her sign the statement.
Bruce says Wasfi was a speaker there. He liked her speech, and he had a back stage pass. He went up to her after the speech, gave her the statement to read. Janice says she saw all this and saw her sign.
So what do you believe, 2 witnesses and a written statement? That's enough for a notary public!
Or somebody's memory after the fact?

Note that Tarpley was not even in Kennebunkport. He and Bruce wrote up the statement on the phone. So why is everybody jumping on Tarpley? IMO Those people are the ones who are really being shown up by this hoax of a hoax.

I figure this hoax stuff is actually giving the warning more press. The only bad publicity is no publicity.

Bruce also said it shows the statement is doing something right if it's strong enough to be controversial. He said people read something, and one thing pops out that they agree with, like impeachment, and they sign it. Maybe after the speech Dahlia was in an expansive mood?

Tarpley's take is that we should support, encourage and praise the signatories for their courage in signing the statement.

Re Cynthia McKinney, Bruce said she gave her verbal support, and I believe it was Janice Weir who said Cynthia's remark on it was that it didn't go far enough !

Go, Cynthia!

Kevin Barrett was also on the show and Tarpley says he was one of the first to post a warning of this kind this year - it's here on 911 blogger and also on his mujca.com site. NeoCon GOP spokesmen have been saying the country needs another 9/11. Since then there have been a couple more terror advocates like Stu Bybofsky

Stu Bykofsky with a K.
Barrett's piece "Feeling Safe Yet? How YOU Can Stop the Next 9/11
–by stockpiling “INSIDE JOB?" signs !" is here is http://911blogger.com/node/10001 or on his website http://mujca.com/stopthenext911.htm where you can buy some of his banners.

It's classic satirical Kevin Barrett with a genial idea - to stockpile materials that we can post around the day after the Next 9/11 to warn people what's really happening.

I liked the idea so much that I've developed a variation on it, small labels and bumper-size stickers, that I'm spending a lot of time these days trying to promote. I'm giving away the bumper stickers for only 20 cents each and a sheet of 30 preprinted labels for only 15 cents each - at my cost.

STICK EM UP! is the motto - on lampposts, parking meters, in restrooms, wherever.

You can see an image of one version of the label at the top of the page on my website, http://www.progressivepress.com, next to the Progressive logo, which takes you to http://www.waronfreedom.org/labels.html.

I'll also do your custom design and text for you.
Where else can you get the word out on the street for only half a cent per ad?

There is a gang of sock puppets here.
Within minutes after posting Moment of Truth, it's buried under 4 minus -
and the latest irrelevant prevarication from Arabesque has plus 4.

Bait and Swap? The technique of a used car salesmen...
I wonder who else was duped on the list?
--
11/11 Never Forget - Fetzer Flips
Zeitgeist Movie Torrent DVDRip (XviD)